An infinitive is the word "to" plus a verb, and those parts together have a function in the sentence. You used one in your question. "To identify" tells what kind of "way" you are asking about. If you are "trying to understand" the connection, "to understand" is the object of your trying.
Another way of saying identify is to label or designate.
"Eh-mey" is a way to pronounce the French word aimer. The present infinitive may be heard pronounced in other ways -- such as "ay-mey" -- in French-speaking countries other than France. Regardless of pronunciation, it translates as "to love" in English.
One way to revise for word choice in English is to read your writing out loud. This can help you identify any awkward or repetitive words, as well as highlight areas where synonyms or more descriptive language could be used. Additionally, utilizing a thesaurus can help you find alternate words with more precise meanings to enhance your writing.
The root syllable 'pos-' is a contracted form of the adjective 'potis'. The adjective is the actual root word. The root syllable is its shortened form. Either way the meaning is capable.
Ger- is the Latin root of 'gerund'. A Latin derivative of the Latin root syllable is the infinitive 'gerere', which means 'to carry about'. An English derivative, by way of the preceding Latin derivative, is the noun 'gerund'.
The infinitive phrase is adjectival: it qualifies "way" The sentence expresses the idea that an "easy" way and a "to win at chess" way cannot coincide. It is similar to "A twenty kilogram miniature poodle doesn't exist", where the phrase is perhaps more clearly adjectival.
Easy? English? The closest you can get is with a Texas accent.
The multiplication sign is shown as X in maths
An easy way to win at chess doesnβt exist
To be is an English equivalent of 'être', as an infinitive. Being or person may be equivalents of 'être' as a masculine noun. Either way, it's pronounced 'ehtr'.
There is no easy way to do your work. You just have to study and practice until you are good at it.
To say is the English equivalent of the Latin root syllable 'dic-'. That syllable is the source for the Latin infinitive 'dicere', which means 'to say'. Both the Latin root and the Latin infinitive, by way of its older first person present indicative form 'deico', are related to the original Greek 'deiknymi'.
An easy way to explain the concept of syllables to a child is to break down the syllables in the actual word with claps or drum beats. In this way, the child learns that they can identify syllables by counting the beats.
"To see say" conversationally and "to say (what is) true" legally are English equivalents of the French phrase voir dire.Specifically, the present infinitive voir means "to see." The present infinitive diremeans "to say, to tell." In the first instance mentioned above, the word voir comes from the Latin present infinitive vidēre for "to see" whereas in the second, the derivation is by way of the Old French form of the Latin neuter adjective verum for "(that which is) true."
"I am" or "I follow" are English equivalents of the French phrase Je suis.Specifically, the pronoun je means "I." The verb suis means "(I) am" if it is the first person singular of the present indicative form of the infinitive être. It means "(I) am following, do follow, follow" if it is the first person singular of the present indicative of the infinitive suivre.Either way, the pronunciation is the same: "zhuh swee."
Quit looking for the easy way out >:[
An easy way to find a conflict of interests in colleagues is to simply ask them what their interests are. Another way to find these conflicts is to watch the people involved.