In general grammatical terms, a 'because statement' is a prepositional phrase that expresses causality relevant to the meaning of the main clause to which it is attached. An example is as follows: 'Halfway to the airport, he turned the car around because he realized that he had forgotten his computer.'
The statement "I agree with you" is correct. "Am" is not needed in this context because "agree" already indicates the present tense.
This statement is direct speech because it directly quotes what someone said.
It depends if it is a statement or a question. Statement: Because I'm stupid. Question: Why am I an idiot?
The possessive form for the singular noun statement is statement's.
A question and statement combination is called an "interrogative statement," which is a sentence that combines a question and statement into one.
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true
A because statement is used to help you develop the thesis further.
You answer a why question with a because. Why is (statement)? Because (answer).
No.
No you may not ask any questions in your thesis statement, because the thesis statement basically states your answer to whatever you are doing.
Its not a statement of faulty logic because it is a question not a statement, also its not comparing anything so that is why i think its not a faulty statement
There cannot be a proof because the statement is not true.nowhere does the statement say
NO because... u culd say i like men. that is not scientific but it is true
It is a statement that causes laughter because of its absurdity. It provokes and deserves derision. It is rediculous.
There is no mission statement because it has not been loaded in fully yet.
Of course the for loop is terminated in C. All statements are terminated. Look at the syntax of the for statement... for (init-statement; test-condition; loop-statement) body-statement; That looks quite terminated to me. (By the semi-colon) Perhaps you are thinking about statement blocks... for (init-statement; test-condition; loop-statement) { statement; statement; ... statement; } ... Well, that is just fine because the body-statement, like any other statement, can be replaced by one or more statements enclosed in braces. There is still a terminating semi-colon on each statement. if i am understanding ur ques. right then according to me it is correct that for loop is not terminated because we do not execute for loop.we only check the conditions. those statements are terminated which we want to execute. because using a semicolon or terminating the statement means that statement is execitable.
I strongly believe that Bartolomeo Vanzetti's last statement was true because Moore's statement was not tangible.