technically it was Indiana, but the bill was never passed, and 3 was not the specified number. it was the response to the bill that referenced The Bible as follows:
THE WISDOM OF SOLOMON: NOT WHAT IT'S CRACKED UP TO BE
Dear Cecil:
Your response to the question about attempts to legislate pi suggests not only that your scholarship is weak but that you are a heathen. When King Solomon constructed the Temple of Jerusalem, the Second Book of Chronicles, chapter 4, verses 2 and 5, tells us:
"Then he made the Sea [a big tub] of cast bronze, ten cubits from one brim to the other; it was completely round. Its height was five cubits and a line of thirty cubits measured its circumference. It was a handbreadth thick; and its brim was shaped like the brim of a cup..... It contained three thousand baths."
The ratio of 30 cubits for the circumference to 10 cubits for the diameter "from one brim to the other" of the "completely round" circle gives the value of pi as being exactly 3. Perhaps reliance on the Word of God motivated the Indiana legislators you trashed. You should have checked with the ultimate reference. --H.K.S., Springfield, Virginia
Cecil replies:
Some of the mail I get is unbelievable. As I attempted to point out, the Indiana legislature did not consider making pi equal to 3, but rather to 3.2, 4, or approximately 3.23, depending on which formula you used. Neither the text of the bill nor any of the commentaries regarding it refer to the Bible. Perhaps Tennessee, Oklahoma, Kansas or one of the other states I mentioned was the one that attempted to a legislate a pi of biblical proportions.
Interesting you should bring this up, though. In 150 A.D. a Hebrew rabbi and scholar named Nehemiah attempted to explain away the anomaly in Chronicles by saying that the diameter of the tub was 10 cubits from outer rim to outer rim, whereas the 30 cubit circumference was measured around the inner rim. In other words, the difference between the biblical notion of pi and the actual value may be accounted for by the width of the tub's walls. How's that for tap dancing, eh? Nehemiah lived a long time ago, but I feel he's my spiritual kin.
- Cecil Adams
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/805/did-a-state-legislature-once-pass-a-law-saying-pi-equals-3
In the 19th century, Indiana tried to legislate a value for pi under the Indiana Pi Bill. The bill sought to establish a specific, incorrect value of pi as 3.2, but it was never enacted into law due to its mathematical inaccuracy.
Always the US Constitution. The USC was developed before any state laws or state constitutions and in all court hearing you plead your case the United States Supreme court. States are allowed to interpret laws, though the US Supreme Court may overturn a decision. Once a law is formed all states must abide. That is why there was such turmoil when George Bush tried to ban Gay marriage. If he were successful they no state would hve the right to perform or recognize gay marriage. That being said if there is no law, a state does have the option to create and inforce laws to help keep it's citizens safe.
The past tense is trialed (US English) or trialled (British English)
Casey Anthony is a US citizen. She is a resident of the state of Florida.
The correct order of the ladder of laws in the US from top to bottom is: the US Constitution, federal laws (including treaties), state constitutions, and state laws. The Supremacy Clause establishes that the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land, followed by federal laws and treaties.
Vermont was the first state to abolish slavery in its constitution in 1777.
Yes there once was a US state that tried to legislate the value of pi
Indiana Bill no. 246 in 1987.
It didn't happen; no state ever tried to legislate the value of pi. There was an urban legend that Alabama had tried to do it, but that was an April Fool's Day joke. It worked, didn't it? You probably fell for the "Spaghetti Fields of Switzerland" one too, didn't you?
The US Congress has the right to legislate that activity.
Any of the state quarters struck of circulation have face value only.
Yes, they tried to persecute us gays
No. We don't have statehood. We have a Commonwealth Status.
No. Violations of federal law are tried in US District Court. Violations of state laws in the state court system.
Not by his own authoritty, but Cogress could probably legislate to hold one.
Probably a Southern state; the one the produces the smallest value of products and takes in a much higher value
States' rights refers to powers reserved for the state governments rather than the U.S. federal government. Examples include the power to create local governments within the state and ratify amendments to the Constitution.
The US does not impose a value-added tax.