0
Those who defended slavery claimed that the economy would be ruined if slavery were to go away. They said that tobacco, rice, and cotton crops would no longer earn a profit for plantation owners in the South.Some even claimed that slavery was natural and used The Bible to back up their arguments.
Arguments in support of slavery historically included claims that it was justified by race, religion, and economic benefits. Proponents argued that slaves were inferior and meant to serve the interests of slave owners. Additionally, they believed that slaves were necessary for sustaining economic prosperity in industries such as agriculture.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
According to Kolchin during the antebellum period many defenders of slavery as a means of reforming the institution of slavery.?
Yes, during the antebellum period, some defenders of slavery argued that reforming the institution would address its perceived problems and improve conditions for enslaved people. They believed that by implementing regulations and guidelines, slavery could be made more humane and beneficial for both slaveholders and slaves. This perspective was often used to counter abolitionist arguments and justify the continuation of slavery.
Abolitionism was what kind of movement?
Abolitionism was a social and political movement that sought to end the institution of slavery. Abolitionists believed that slavery was morally wrong and worked to promote the emancipation of enslaved individuals and the abolition of slavery as a legal institution.
Did democrats support dred Scott law?
No, Democrats did not support the Dred Scott decision. The decision was made by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1857, and it was predominantly supported by Southern Democrats who wanted to protect the institution of slavery. The decision ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens and therefore did not have standing to sue in federal court.
Why did Lincoln say I have no purpose directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so and I have no in?
Abraham Lincoln saw keeping the United States intact as his most important mission. He was personally against slavery, however, he recognized that under cases decided by the US Supreme Court, the institution of slavery was legal. He also recognized that slavery did not exist as a "Southern" creation. Since before the US was a nation, slavery existed. It was clear to him that slavery could have been abolished long ago. And, that the North was just as guilty as anyone else for the institution of slavery. Lincoln, as the US President, sought to assure the Southern slave States that he had no intention to interfere with slavery where it existed. He did this in his duty to protect the Constitutional rights of all "citizens". He understood that under the Constitution, slaves were not considered "citizens".
Why was slavery accepted in the colonies?
Slavery was accepted in the colonies primarily for economic reasons, as it provided a cheap source of labor for plantations and agricultural work. Additionally, there were existing racial prejudices that dehumanized African slaves and justified their enslavement in the eyes of many colonists. The legal and social structures of the time also supported and perpetuated the institution of slavery.
What new argument were made to support slavery?
There were many new arguments made to support slavery. Some argued that slaves were needed so that there would be enough man-power to feed the country.
According to Kolchin during the antebellum period many defenders of slavery as a means of reforming the institution of slavery.?
Yes, during the antebellum period, some defenders of slavery argued that reforming the institution would address its perceived problems and improve conditions for enslaved people. They believed that by implementing regulations and guidelines, slavery could be made more humane and beneficial for both slaveholders and slaves. This perspective was often used to counter abolitionist arguments and justify the continuation of slavery.
Gag rule?
1835 law passed by Southern congress which made it illegal to talk of abolition or anti-slavery arguments in Congress
The few attacks of the institution of slavery during the colonial period were usually made by?
Quakers
Who made slavery happen?
We cannot say who invented slavery as an institution; slavery has been practised for a very long time, long before recorded history.
When Polk believed no one would take enslave persons to the southwest because?
he assumed that the institution of slavery was not necessary or viable in that region. Polk believed that the economic and social conditions of the southwest did not support the establishment of slavery, and therefore, enslaving individuals would not be a profitable or practical endeavor.
What arguments could you have made in support of the articles?
I think you could be talking about a Debate
Abolitionism was what kind of movement?
Abolitionism was a social and political movement that sought to end the institution of slavery. Abolitionists believed that slavery was morally wrong and worked to promote the emancipation of enslaved individuals and the abolition of slavery as a legal institution.
A popular argument in favor of slavery in the 1800's was A slavery was essential to the health of the economy. B. slavery was a biblical commandment. C. Africans were happier enslaved than free D.paid?
All of the above arguments were made in favor of slavery.
Why did Lincoln support the ending of slavery?
Because the British were threatening to support the Confederates, and by turning the war into an official crusade against slavery, Lincoln made it impossible for the British to do this without looking pro-slavery.
Why does Sojourner Truth claim that slavery is sanctioned by the religion of America?
Sojourner Truth claimed that slavery was sanctioned by the religion of America because slave owners used religion to justify their actions, quoting Bible verses to support slavery. She argued that this practice distorted the true teachings of faith and made a moral wrong seem acceptable by conflating it with religious beliefs. Truth believed that this false justification perpetuated the institution of slavery.
Did democrats support dred Scott law?
No, Democrats did not support the Dred Scott decision. The decision was made by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1857, and it was predominantly supported by Southern Democrats who wanted to protect the institution of slavery. The decision ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens and therefore did not have standing to sue in federal court.
