0
If you take the example of the UK (where guns are banned), the normal police on duty on the streets are not armed with guns. There are UK police trained to use and carry guns but they only do so when responding to a situation where a criminal is seen to be armed.
Based on this tried example, is is clear that if guns were banned effectively, the police would not need to carry weapons.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can you kill someone with a turnip?
Yes, although I very much doubt you would be able to get it on the banned list of illegal weapons.
Should people be able to carry a concealed weapons?
Certainly.
Which people in the US should be able to carry weapons?
cops and people with a licence
Why were they banned from producing weapons germany?
so they could never be able to gain control of any country to do anymore damage
Why would a dynasty with great weapons be able to beat a dynasty without weapons?
The answer is in your question. The people with weapons will always beat the ones without.
Should students be able to carry a concealed weapons?
No, since there is no need for them there why provide firepower to all students including the immature ones.
What if you get banned for 72 hours?
Of course, you won't be able to play for the 72 hours you're banned. You won't be able to log in.
Would archeabacteria be able to carry out cellular respiration?
anaerobic bacteria
What does mule kick do in Call of Duty Black Ops?
It allows you to carry 3 weapons in zombies map moon
What would have happened in Kush and Egypt if Kush had developed iron weapons?
Kush would have able to conquer more lands
What function would the cell not be able to carry out if the nucleus is removed?
All functions
What chemical reaction would a pioneer species have to be able to carry out?
chemical reactions
