I'm only in high school, but I've been taking training courses to be an attorney since middle school. So, I would take my own advice.
Typically, in most criminal cases, when it comes down to "he says, she says" the judge will usually believe the police. This is how police brutality and violations of Miranda rights can be so blatantly ignored. If the trial is allowed to continue, and the prosecution has a solid case, the judge may take the word of the police officers, or forged witnesses, and proceed to hand down a guilty verdict.
However, if you believe that an injustice is being done, and the only evidence against you is testimony, you can often call the police out, and rattle the prosecution's case by pointing out that testimony alone is not enough, material evidence is needed. Also, ask for another police witness if necessary, perhaps you can find a discrepancy between their testimonies. If testimony is the only incriminating evidence, and no (or not very influential) material evidence is uncovered, a not guilty verdict will most likely be passed.
However, if there is substantial material evidence AND police testimony against you, you might as well get chummy with the prison guards, because chances are you'll be put away, whether you're innocent or not.
Hope that helped. Police are sworn law enforcement officials known by the court and trained on how to testify--you are not. Testimony is "direct evidence" and is all that's needed for a conviction.
The mayor was in cahoots with the judge. The judge was in cahoots with the cops. The cops were in cahoots with the crooks. The victim was in cahoots with the insurance agent.
Take it to small claims court.
Vanzetti did not believe that Judge Thayer had been fair and impartial
Vanzetti did not believe that Judge Thayer had been fair and impartial
I do not believe that anyone has the right to judge another person.
its almost impossible. even when you tell the truth, they think you liein
Sure they can. If they have reason to believe that you pose a danger to themselves and/or the public, they can kill you.
According to Urban Dictionary it is 5obia, a fear of the police (usually a developed fear, after a traumatic encounter with the cops). However, I do not believe this is a valid psychological classification.According to Urban Dictionary it is 5obia, a fear of the police (usually a developed fear, after a traumatic encounter with the cops). However, I do not believe this is a valid psychological classification.According to Urban Dictionary it is 5obia, a fear of the police (usually a developed fear, after a traumatic encounter with the cops). However, I do not believe this is a valid psychological classification.According to Urban Dictionary it is 5obia, a fear of the police (usually a developed fear, after a traumatic encounter with the cops). However, I do not believe this is a valid psychological classification.According to Urban Dictionary it is 5obia, a fear of the police (usually a developed fear, after a traumatic encounter with the cops). However, I do not believe this is a valid psychological classification.According to Urban Dictionary it is 5obia, a fear of the police (usually a developed fear, after a traumatic encounter with the cops). However, I do not believe this is a valid psychological classification.
I believe the question refers to a judge who happens to sit on the bench of a Superior Court - hence a Superior Court Judge.
I personally believe that it is wrong to judge people based on their religion.
Jerry SPringer, cops, cheaters, News, most wanted, oprah, and judge judy
The cops can just about do whatever they want to do and a crooked judge will always side with them!