One of the leading cases that has tested police power over drunk drivers is the case of Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz (1990). In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of sobriety checkpoints, ruling that they were a reasonable measure to combat drunk driving and did not violate Fourth Amendment rights. This case established the principle that police have the power to conduct sobriety checkpoints as long as certain procedural safeguards are in place.
Schmerber v. California (gradpoint)
they have upheld the right of society to protect itself against drunk drivers and rejected individual rights arguments
they have upheld the right of society to protect itself against drunk drivers and rejected individual rights arguments
It is the power to arrest the people breaking the laws. Driving when drunk is an offence under negligence and the police can arrest someone.
looks like someone nervous....
maybe gun power tasted bad. Only a sober man would spit it out.
what are the characteristics of police
what are the characteristics of police
see definition at police-power
Actually, yes, in a sense you are the difference between drink and drunk. Only you have the power to have a drink or two and have so many that you get drunk.
In the 18th century, police were often viewed with suspicion and fear by the public. They were seen as agents of the government, enforcing laws that limited personal freedoms and rights. Police were sometimes accused of corruption, brutality, and abuse of power, leading to a lack of trust from the community.
The police are on super power everywhere and police station counterfiet.