Items in plain view can be seized without obtaining a search warrant.
Elements can contain plain text, other elements, or both.
Actually, there are more like 6 exceptions to the warrant requirement. They are: (1)stop and frisk situation--also known as a terry stop (2)when the police have the consent of the individual or someone who also lives in the house (3)when the search involves an automobile (4)when the illegal item is in plain view and the police are on the property pursuant to a proper search warrant (5)when the search is incident to an arrest (6)and when there is an emergency type situation such as in hot pursuit of a suspect or there is the fear that the individual may destroy evidence before a search warrant can be obtained.
Yes. Enforcement officers do not need a search warrant in a variety of instances. If there is consent to a search, you do not need a warrant. If something is in plain view, you do not need a warrant. Also, warrants are not needed in emergency situations when the public safety is in danger.
Western Europe is mostly plain with the exception of the Iberian Peninsula, Italy, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and Austria.
Plain view, exigent circumstances, search with consent.
Yes. It is usually referred to as 'plain view.'
It is possible that if the police were there at the time the drugs were sold then an exigent circumstance exception could apply. However that is not normally the case. Most often the information about drug sales are presented to a magistrate and a warrant is obtained. The police may then do a controlled buy to confirm drugs are in the house immediately prior to the warrant service.
The fourth amendment to the U.S. Constitution refers to searches and stipulates that a warrant must be obtained prior to a search. However, there are seven recognized exceptions: 1. Consent 2. Plain view 3. Incident to arrest 4. Motor vehicle exception 5. Exigent circumstances 6. Caretaker function 7. Inventory search
Yes ... you can see it ... anyone can see it ... it is in plain view. However, it is on private property and a warrant may be required to remove it unless it is being repossessed.
In Canada and most of the United States, the answer is "yes", as long as the Police did not exceed the scope of the warrant when they discovered the evidence of the new offense. For example, if a search warrant is issued to search your house for a suspected marijuana growing operation, and in the course of that search the Police find several fake credit cards, those cards are admissible as evidence of credit card fraud. Some jurisdictions either require or make a precautionary habit of calling a Judge to expand a warrant's scope during the search if they find something not covered in the original warrant, however that is the rare exception. Also, both SCOTUS and the Supreme Court of Canada have both held that their respective versions of the "Plain Sight" rule apply to evidence discovered in the course of executing an unrelated warrant. For instance, if the Police have a warrant to search only one bedroom of a boarding house, but there is a crack pipe on the hall table, that crack pipe is perfectly admissible under Plain Sight, even though it is inside a private residence.
If their search is conducted completely in conformance to the wording of the warrant they can only search for and seize what the warrant allows AND anything else which lies IN PLAIN SIGHT. If they obtain your consent to conduct a search, they may search ANYWHERE and seize ANYTHING they find that is of an unlawful, or illegal nature.