he didn't
Susan Anthony's argument uses pathos-based arguments because of the use of numerous rhetorical devices including distinction.
Susan Anthony's argument uses pathos-based arguments because of the use of numerous rhetorical devices including distinction.
Using pathos in an argument can help to evoke emotions in the audience, making the argument more relatable and engaging. It can also be used to establish a connection with the audience and inspire them to take action based on their emotional responses.
rhetoric; pathos
pathos
Pathos
A writer would use pathos in an opinion piece to evoke emotions in the reader and create a connection with them. By appealing to the reader's emotions, the writer can make their argument more persuasive and engaging, leading to a stronger impact on the reader.
Yes, it is recommended to use ethos, pathos, and logos in an editorial to establish credibility (ethos), appeal to emotions (pathos), and provide logical reasoning (logos). Combining all three elements can enhance the persuasiveness and effectiveness of the editorial's argument.
If you constructed a logical argument that also appeals to your audience's emotions, it would be an example of using both logos (logical appeal) and pathos (emotional appeal) in rhetoric. By combining both logical reasoning and emotional appeal, you can create a more compelling and persuasive argument that resonates with your audience on both intellectual and emotional levels.
In a personal argument the use of obscenity.
The use of emotional language, vivid imagery, personal anecdotes, and appeals to shared values or beliefs can appeal to the emotions of the audience in an argument.