0
An "unfunded mandate" is any federal law that requires the state or local government to provide some service, but does not provide any federal funds to provide that service. Thus, States or Localities are told to perform some task, but are not given any money to do it. They must take money out of their normal budgets, even if it means cuts to other programs. The concern is that the federal government does not know how costly these mandates are, and since they provide no compensatory monies, the federal government feels free to make these requirements of the localities with no repercussions to the federal budget (but the laws often severe impact the state or local budgets).
The federal government forces the state or locality to do its "job" for free (that is, it's free for the federal government to push the work to the state, which has to pay for someone else's decisions).
The term has come into vogue to particularly describe laws requiring certain actions in fields traditionally reserved for the states' discretion. Education is a big one - states have traditionally set educational standards and methods, and funding for education is provided by state and local taxation as well as through State lottery programs. "Unfunded mandates" through federal legislation that dictates educational standards and requirements, when the state is required to implement these federal standards using its normal state education budget, means an extra financial without any federal monies.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Governors of 35 states have filed suit against the?
Federal Government to block execution of unfunded mandates.
What is competitive federalism?
The states and government compete for leadership of the country's domestic policy. Much of the conflict is over unfunded mandates.
Why are unfunded mandates difficult for states to deal with?
States do not have the money to put them in action. They need to find another way to get the money in order to meet the requirements.
True or False unfunded federal mandates on the states were outlawed byt the US Supreme court in Hammar v Dagenhart?
false
Is the Americans with disabilities act a federal mandate?
Yes, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Amendments Act of 2008 are unfunded mandates. An unfunded mandate is any piece of federal legislation which requires the states to follow a set of regulations without providing an explicit means to finance them. The ADA, ADAAA, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, etc are all examples of unfunded mandates.
unfunded mandates?
Programs that the Federal government requires States to implement without Federal funding.
What has the author Paul L Posner written?
Paul L. Posner has written: 'The politics of unfunded mandates' -- subject(s): Intergovernmental fiscal relations, Fiscal policy, Unfunded mandates 'IRS' accounts receivable inventory' -- subject(s): Accounting, United States, United States. Internal Revenue Service 'Budgeting for Emergencies' 'Federal debt' -- subject(s): Budget, Debts, Public, Management, Public Debts, Surplus (Economics), United States, United States. Dept. of the Treasury 'Compendium of Budget Accounts, 2000'
What is the federal order that states operate and pay for a program created at the national level?
Unfunded mandates states that the federal order that states operate and pay for a program created at the national level. The balance between national powers and state have changed greatly since the Constitution was written.
Why are unfunded mandates difficult to deal with?
An "unfunded mandate" is a requirement from a higher level of government that some lower level of government must enforce and pay for. It's easy for the Federal government to demand that the STATES pay for something, or for the State to require the LOCAL government to do something; the agency that makes the demand doesn't have to care about the cost, or whether or not it is effective, or even if it works at all.
What is the definition of a dual-payer system?
Single-payer and dual-payer refer to the reimbursement source in (for example) the health care system. In a single-payer system, one entity underwrites all the medical bills; in a dual-payer system, two entities share the burden of cost. The terms have recently been used to distinguish a federal government-supported program, similar to to Medicare (single-payer), from one where the cost is shared by the federal and state governments, similar to Medicaid (dual-payer). If someone is complaining about single-payer health care (generally refers to the federal government), they are most likely concerned about taxes, quality of care and access issues. If someone is complaining about dual-payer health care, they are most likely concerned about federal legislation imposing unfunded mandates on the states, or about the states' ability to carry their share of the expenses.
What law was concerned with how governments treated citizens?
in crimal cases what law states that you can use laws differently just because you don't like that person
What are expressed the powers?
Are powers specifically expressed by the constitution of the United States of America, giving the government authority over international affairs, interstate matters, and influence over state governments in circumstances where two or more states are concerned.
