Since March 9, 2011, the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, the part which prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages, has been defended by the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group ("BLAG") of the United States House of Representatives.
BLAG took over defending the law because the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ"), which normally defends the constitutionality of Federal Laws, announced on February 23, 2011, that it agreed that the law was constitutional and would no longer argue in favor of it in court.
It should be noted that Section 2, which permits states and local governments to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages formed in other states, is still considered constitutional by the DOJ and they are presumably still defending that law in court.
Since March 9, 2011, when the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group ("BLAG") took over defense of the constitutionality of section 3 of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA"), a total of four million dollars ($4,000,000) has been spent on sending lawyers to federal courts to argue that the law is not unconstitutional. Section 3 of DOMA prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages.
the role of the defense is the person who is defending the victim
Some could interpret it as such. Massachusetts has argued in federal court that the federal Defense of Marriage Act forces that state to discriminate against its own residents in the administration of certain entitlement programs funded (at least partially) by the federal government.
The President has offered his personal endorsement of same-sex marriage. He has also instructed the Justice Department to stop defending the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") in federal lawsuits. He has asked the Justices of the US Supreme Court to strike down Section 3 of DOMA.
It apparently became unconstitutional when the first same-sex couple married and were denied some federal benefit. On June 26, 2013, the US Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") was unconstitutional.
A defense attorney is responsible for defending juveniles in juvenile court. They are also responsible for negotiating pleas and sentences.
No. Hara v. Officer of Personnel Management (2009-3134) is currently stayed pending the US Supreme Court's anticipated decision in Gill.
They support it. On February 27, 2013, eBay Inc. filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court urging the court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act and force the Federal Government to recognize same-sex marriages.
They support it. On February 27, 2013, Intuit Inc. filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court urging the court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act and force the Federal Government to recognize same-sex marriages.
They support it. On February 27, 2013, Pfizer Inc. filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court urging the court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act and force the Federal Government to recognize same-sex marriages.
They support it. On February 27, 2013, Twitter Inc. filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court urging the court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act and force the Federal Government to recognize same-sex marriages.
They support it. On February 27, 2013, Qualcomm Incorporated filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court urging the court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act and force the Federal Government to recognize same-sex marriages.