The Federal Arbitration Act requires judicial resolution through arbitration. There needs to be a contract in place that requires arbitration instead of judicial resolution.
If this was a court-ordered arbitration, that information would be forwarded to the judge who ordered the arbitration in the first place and would factor into their decision in the case. If this is a case of binding arbitration, and the referee found in your favor, then you win.
In binding arbitration, the parties contractually agree that they will be bound and abide by the decision of the arbitrator. In non-binding arbitration, each party is free to reject the decision of the arbitrator and either do nothing or take the matter to court.
Clarence H. Curtis has written: 'Labour arbitration procedures' -- subject(s): Arbitration, Industrial, Industrial Arbitration 'Labour arbitration in the courts' -- subject(s): Arbitration, Industrial, Cases, Certiorari, Industrial Arbitration
$268million
How long does it take to get n answer
That is arbitration ruled by law.
By arbitration, which may take some time.
Chaco War
Joseph Dame Weeks has written: 'Report on the practical operation of arbitration and conciliation in the settlement of differences between employers and employees in England' -- subject(s): Arbitration, Industrial, Industrial Arbitration 'Industrial arbitration and conciliation in France and England' -- subject(s): Arbitration, Industrial, Industrial Arbitration
William Howard Taft has written: 'The proposed arbitration treaties with Great Britain and France' -- subject(s): Arbitration and award, Arbitration, International, International Arbitration
G. K. Kwatra has written: 'Arbitration and alternative dispute resolution' -- subject(s): Arbitration and award, International, Arbitration and award, International Arbitration and award