The plural possessive form of "defendant" is "defendants'".
Defenadnt'S is singular but "defendants" is plural.
Of course it is. Defendants are not criminals.
C. M. Hawley has written: 'Habeas corpus decision' 'In the Circuit Court of Winnebago County, in chancery, Elisha S. Wadsworth vs. Francis B. Cooley, John V. Farwell, et al., defendants, argument of C.M. Hawley, esq., on the hearing in behalf of the defendants' -- subject(s): Fraud, Partnership
Plaintiffs do not have a surrebuttal. They have a rebuttal. Defendants reply is the surreebuttal. Plaintiffs case in chief Defendants case in chief Plaintiffs rebuttal Defendants surrebuttal
Andrew Jackson's argument in "The Arrogance and Cruelty of Power" highlighted the dangers of unchecked centralized government power, emphasized the importance of individual liberties and states' rights, criticized the National Bank as a tool of oppression, advocated for limited government intervention in the economy, stressed the need for a strict interpretation of the Constitution, warned against the corrupting influence of special interests in politics, and called for greater transparency and accountability in government actions.
I am unfamiliar with (never heard of) the "effectiveness defense" and (in the U.S.) there are no defendants charged with "torture."
The prosecutor tries the defendants and presents evidence to find the defendants guilty.
Because most criminal defendants cannot afford the expense of the experts.
They will do their job which does include running checks on their defendants. And no prosecutor would let them skip it.
arraignment
Defendants