It's known as "collusion"
The attorney who calls the witness conducts a direct examination. The opposing attorney may then conduct a cross examination. The first attorney may then conduct a redirect exam, whereupon the opposing attorney may conduct a recross exam.
Bob Ewell is the attorney opposing Atticus Finch in the novel "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee.
it is called objection..
Nothing "happens" unless the opposing party can provide proof to the court. Once the court rules then the attorney can face sanctions imposed by the court and, if reported, sanctions can be imposed by the state board of bar overseers. You should consult with your attorney. It's up to the opposing party to pursue it.Nothing "happens" unless the opposing party can provide proof to the court. Once the court rules then the attorney can face sanctions imposed by the court and, if reported, sanctions can be imposed by the state board of bar overseers. You should consult with your attorney. It's up to the opposing party to pursue it.Nothing "happens" unless the opposing party can provide proof to the court. Once the court rules then the attorney can face sanctions imposed by the court and, if reported, sanctions can be imposed by the state board of bar overseers. You should consult with your attorney. It's up to the opposing party to pursue it.Nothing "happens" unless the opposing party can provide proof to the court. Once the court rules then the attorney can face sanctions imposed by the court and, if reported, sanctions can be imposed by the state board of bar overseers. You should consult with your attorney. It's up to the opposing party to pursue it.
Examination of a witness by opposing counsel is called cross-examination, assuming that by "opposing counsel" you mean examining a witness that is testifying against the client of the opposing counsel. Examination by either counsel of witnesses in favor of their client's position is called direct examination.
Direct examination is when the witness is FIRST questioned in court by an attorney (usually their own lawyer), when he is questioned by the opposing side it is called "cross-examination."
A client seeks out an attorney to protect his/her confidential information regarding the case the attorney is retained to protect. If the confidential information is released to the opposing attorney, the clients attorney chance of winning is dramatically reduced.
The attorney ellicited a reply from the witness.Attacks of a personal nature ellicited negative responses.
I believe they are called pleadings. [From an online legal glossary: "pleadings:complaint or petition, answer, and reply"
Attorney associate with those in their professions, and develop friendships. This does not change their duty and obligation. Didn't you ever watch the TV program J.A.G.? It's a good example of this.
That is a matter of ethics rather than law. It would seem advantageous for an attorney to at least speak with the opposing counsel - but they may have their reasons not to do so. If you are unhappy with your attorney's performance employ a new attorney.