0
I also seek an answer to this question. There were Medieval examples (the Humiliati, Franciscans, etc.). But their 'vows of poverty' seem a bit idividualistic/self-indulgent. There are also similar examples in other societies (i.e., the sadhus and sanyasins of India). Generally, these practices were focused individual 'redemtion/repenitence'. They do not reflect an understanding of the great benefit to all society of a universal rejection of ownership.
The best sources of a 'rejection of ownership' philosophy would be further back in history. Ancient indigenous cultures simply did not have a word for 'ownership'. Land ownership didn't even exist. This, of course, applied to nomadic cultures, since their livlihood was dependent on moving freely over vast areas. But, it also applied to other cultures.
My favorite example is the Ancient Hawaiians - isolated in the middle of the Pacific, further from continents than any other land mass. They only had each other. They had no land ownership - they instead had the concept of 'kuleana' (responsibility, stewardship). It could fall to a group or to a ruling elite. (The ruling elite would have been dependent on the group, so the distinction is minor.) The land ('aina) was (is) considered a living entity - a spirtual entity above humans. It deserves repect, reverence, awe and even fear. One does not harm the 'aina in any way - especially not for one's own comfort or profit. The health and welfare of the humans depended on 'kapus' (accepted taboos - especially regarding sustainable hunting, fishing, farming and gathering) and on living 'pono' (doing what is right - for all, for the future generations and for the 'aina ... not just the individual).
On an island, the understanding of interdependence and reciprocity is fundemental -- actually, *essential* to survival. Including the 'aina as a Being in this philosophy is prescient, at the least.
The Hawaiian philosophy of living would be a good one for the global community (as an island in the universe) to consider at this point in time!
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What three rights accompany the ownership of private property?
use, enjoyment and bare ownership
Are Russians allowed to have private property?
Yes, Russians are legally allowed to own private property. Private property rights are protected under the Russian Constitution, and individuals can buy, sell, and inherit property, as well as lease or rent it. However, there are restrictions and regulations that govern property ownership in Russia.
What is absolute ownership?
is the direct rights of ownership over a property which a particular person posses and he or she can do what ever on the land for they own the rights on the property.
What are some examples of the establishment of private property led to later developments?
The establishment of private property rights has led to economic development by incentivizing individuals to invest in and improve their property, resulting in increased productivity and wealth creation. Additionally, private property ownership has stimulated innovation and technological advancements as individuals seek new ways to utilize and maximize the value of their assets. Furthermore, the protection of private property rights has been associated with political stability and social order, as it provides individuals with a sense of security and ownership over their possessions.
What belief held by john Locke became the foundation of European and the American democracy?
people have natural rights of life, liberty, and ownership of property
What is the most fundamental right of the private enterprise system?
Freedom of choice is a fundamental right of individuals who work in a private enterprise system. The ownership of property and profits are also fundamental rights of the system.
Why does the book turn to talk of private property?
The discussion of private property often arises in books because it is a fundamental concept in understanding society, economics, and governance. Authors may delve into discussions around private property to explore themes related to ownership, individual rights, power dynamics, and the impact of property ownership on individuals and societies. This exploration can provide insight into various aspects of human behavior, relationships, and societal structures.
How do private property rights contribute to a capitalist system?
If there were no private property rights then there could be no private businesses and that would mean that it would not be a capitalist system.
Why is private property and the protection of property rights so critical to be success of the market system?
Why is private property, and the protection of property rights, so critical to the success of the market system?
What is the premise of capitalism?
It is a system that is based on the private ownership of the means of production. The goal is to make a profit. Property rights and a lack of government control over markets are emphasized.
If you have oil under your property Is it illegal to build an oil well in the US on private land?
You will need to own the mineral rights on the land, which are separate from ownership of the surface land.
Is there a right to property?
That depends on the laws in any particular jurisdiction. Some allow private property ownership and some do not. Regardless of a belief in some inherent rights, in reality a citizen is subject to the laws of their particular country.
