the first ten amendments to the federal Constitution
The main Provisions of the Australian constitution are:TaxesDefenseTradesCommerce
Note three provisions in japans new constitution
The constitution makes the president the chief administrator of the federal government
expand the breif provisions of the constitution
Note three provisions in japans new constitution
this constitution is the 3rd. constitution in the USA.
Two provisions of the Constitution of 1982 were it made Canada a COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT and BILINGUAL NATION.
common provisions
The Canadian Constitution is a product of Trudeau and the Liberal Party. He, effectively, wrote it and included all provisions he wanted. A better question might be what changes did he make or accept. The answer to that is very few. Canadians, particularly those outside of Quebec and Ontario, were allowed little input to the Constitution unless they agreed with the Constitution creators. The provisions Trudeau most wanted was increased Federal powers over the provinces and economy and less power and rights for Citizens. Many view the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to be Trudeau's compromise to get the added Federal powers and added Ontario and Quebec powers which include veto power over changes should the majority of the members in Confederation not agree.
The state militia negociates the provisions of the federal goverment?
Secession, as happened to precipitate the U.S. Civil War. The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution provides for the the primacy of federal law in the States, as does its constitutional-law progeny, the doctrine of federal preemption.Certain provisions of State Constitutions can be upheld by State Supreme Courts, and when upheld in a certain manner, the Supreme Court of the United States voluntarily abstains from jurisdiction according to the doctrine of adequate and independent State grounds. But even then, such judicial decisions cannot narrow or contravene federal Constitutional law. For instance, the eminent domain provisions of the Florida Constitution are broader than those found in the U.S. Constitution, but the Florida Supreme Court could not uphold a provision in the Florida Constitution or an Act of the Florida Legislature declaring narrower eminent-domain provisions than those in the U.S. Constitution.