That's what makes the warrant legal. It signifies that he has read and reviewed the warrant affidavit and found it legal and proper.
Your attorney could arrange for you to come in an voluntarily meet with the judge. However, if you encounter law enforcement before that time they'd be required to bring you to the judge on the basis of confirming the bench warrant. The bench warrant is likely for failure to appear, so if your attorney contacts the court to make an appearance with you they may be able to get the warrant set aside. If you know what court the warrant is out of you may be able to contact the clerk of that court and see if there is a bond you could pay to get the warrant set aside until a new court date could be set. Just some ideas. No idea what state, county, or municipality you are in and that absolutely makes a difference in how they do their business. (But your attorney will know). BTW, I am almost positive that no matter where you live, the police station is not the place to take care of it unless you just want to turn yourself in and be booked into jail and see the judge that way.
A bench warrant can be issued for a person with a judgment if they fail to comply with the terms of the judgment, such as failing to pay fines or appear in court as required. The bench warrant allows law enforcement to arrest the person and bring them before the court to address the violation.
A warrant is VALIDATED by the signature of the approving judge or magistrate. An APPLICATION for a warrant must include enough information (who-what-when-where-how) and include "probable cause" that what is sworn to in the warrant is taking place within the premises named.
The judge hears evidence provided on both sides, and makes rulings on the law. In the case of bench trials, they also decide on the verdict. They run the court room.
A jury in a trial makes the same decisions as a judge would in a bench trial. Based on evidence, they decide if a person charged is guilty or innocent.
A bench trial is a trial conducted before a judge without a jury. In such trials, the judge decides both questions of facts and questions of law. A jury trial is a civil or criminal trial which the case is decided by the jury who observes the proceedings then deliberates in private and makes the fineal decision The rules of evidence and procedural methods are the same in both kinds of proceedings.
Question makes no sense. A search warrant is a search warrant regardless of WHERE the premises is physically located.
Yes, it is. If you are referring to the date that the warrant was actually served does not match the date that the judge signed it.... it makes no difference. Often a warrant will be held for a time until law enforcement feels that the time is "just right" to serve it. If the warrant was 'legally sufficient' when the judge signed it, it's still 'legally sufficient' the date it is served.
In a court of law, the final decision is typically made by the judge if it is a bench trial (no jury). In cases with a jury, the final decision is made collectively by the jury based on the evidence presented and the law as instructed by the judge.
The judge is the one who makes the decision.
In the US: Search warrants are issued by judges, magistrates or other judicial officers after application is made by law enforcement. The application (affidavit) identifies the premise(s) to be searched and the probable cause that was developed to support the reason for the search. After review by the judge to be certain that the affidavit is legally sufficient and probable cause does, in fact, exist, the judge signs the affidavit which then legally makes it a warrant and law enforcement carries it out.