What is the role of interpretation in judicial decision making?

Answer 1

Judicial Interpretation is the method of explaining how the judiciary interprets the law precisely the constitutional documents. There are several approaches like: textualist approach, developmentalist approach and doctrinal approach.

Answer 2

Judicial Interpretation is a mode or technique that explains how the judiciary should interpret the law, specifically constitutional documents and legislation. There are several approaches to this, including these: the structuralist approach, doctrinalist approach, developmentalist approach, textualist approach, contextualist approach, and the originalist approach.

Answer 3

Lets take the First Amendment of the US Constitution as an example. The last part of it apples to freedom of speech. The Supreme Court has ruled that the part dealing with freedom of speech means that you can flash your headlights on a car to warn other drivers that there is a speed trap ahead That is an example of judicial interpretation..

Answer 4

The different ways that judges interpret the law results in different applications of the law. The role of judicial interpretation is to govern how judges read the law, so that it may be applied in a manner consistent with the society outlined by our laws.