Owning an image or the copyright to an image are the same thing. When you hold the copyright to an image it is yours to do with whatever you will, and you can decide who has permission to use it or not. There is no difference.
previous answer violated copyright
There is virtually no difference; term of protection is still based on the dates of the artist.
I assume you are asking the difference between plagiarism & copyright infringement. While both are essentially the use of someone elses work without permission, the most significant difference is that plagiarism also involves claiming that material as your own work.
A watermark is a word, or series of words, (do not copy, property of, etc) overlaid in such a way as to make reuse of a copyrighted work more difficult. A copyright notice is intended to to demonstrate ownership of a particular work, that it is protected by copyright, and when that protection began.
The title page is at the beginning of a book or document and shows the name of the work, the Author's name and sometimes a dedication. The Copyright page is usually at the end of the book and shows references to resources and has a copyright paragraph. The copyright paragraph states that no one can copy this article or work without the express permission of the author.
camcorder are general video cameras. sony termed their camcorders as handycam, handycam is copyright to sony.
Software is protected by copyright as a literary work.
There is no difference. Okay, technically there is, but since copyleft is really just a subset of copyright, I don't see the question as a valid one. Copyright laws protect an artistic work from unauthorized reproduction or sale. Copyleft licenses are legal contracts between the creator and the user. They often stipulate that users may reproduce any part (or even the whole) of the work for their own use, so long as they give credit to the original creator. If they don't, presumably, the creator can sue. So a copyleft license is a legal contract between artist and consumer, which is protected by the larger set of copyright laws.
The short answer is No. Simply giving credit for help in producing a work is not sufficient to establish a shared copyright. There is a difference between an acknowlegement and granting someone partial ownership.
Works of sufficient creativity are automatically protected as soon as they are fixed in a tangible medium; the copyright symbol is not required.
copywriting is the process of writing the words that promote a person or business or it is a software application by Bartas Technologies. And Copyright is when you give the writer exclusive rights for a certain time period in relation to that work.