a chief executive writes the opinion for each case if he/she is in the majority.
think so
The jury of executive opinion has the benefit of being a very quick way to provide forecasts from a diverse group of managers who know the strengths and weaknesses of their company. The biggest drawback is that it is overly reliant on opinions, and averaging these opinions may not give the most reliable forecast.
If he abuses his power just like the past few presidents YES... It's called an Executive Order (which, in my opinion, is unconstitutional)
A system of checks and balances would limit the power of the president, thus avoiding a tyrannical leader.
This is an opinion question. His aides, Chief of Staff, and Vice President are all his closest co-workers though.
There were no dissenting opinions because the case ruled against Nixon 8-0. The concurring opinion was a collective agreement between all justices in that the tapes held criminal conduct between the President and his men as well as that Nixon's claim to absolute executive privilege was wrong. Executive privilege is a right to the president; however, it is not absolute and can be checked by the Congress or Supreme Court.
Proposing a budget is one significant way the executive branch is able to influence fiscal policy. The president also has the advantage of a bully pulpit, to try to influence public opinion.
They feared a strong executive that could operate as an authoritarian government
executive
It's a matter of Opinion. Some people say yes and some people say no.
The antonym of executive is non-executive