answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There are a few things that can be considered an open act of war. Some include attacking Another Country or people, mass murder of civilians, and terrorist attacks.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is considered an open act of war?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was considered an act of war in 1914?

Process of assembling troops and supplies and making them ready for war [in 1914, this was considered an act of war]


What was considered an act of war?

an act of war was when somebody did something that offended some one else


Levying war against the United States is considered what?

an act of war


Was making alliances during World War 1 considered an act of war?

no


Why the Civil War is considered a rebellion?

Because it was a revolutionary act in defiance of the elected government of the USA.


What act signaled the beginning of the Korean War?

Open war began when the forces of North Korea moved into the south on June 25th, 1950.


Who ordered mobilization of troops knowing that it would be considered an act of war?

Russia was determined to support Serbia's cause. On July 28, Czar Nicholas II ordered partial mobilization of the Russian army against Austria-Hungary. Mobilization is the process of assembling troops and supplies for war. In 1914 mobilization was considered an act of war.


Why was James Buchanan considered the worst president?

He failed to act on multiple opportunities to prevent the US Civil War.


Why did the North consider the Civil War a war for rebellion?

When the Southern States seceded, it was considered an act of treason. It was believed, in essence, that they were destroying the Union that they had helped to form.


Why is Benedict Arnold considered an American traitor?

Arnold was trading secrets to and from both sides of the war committing an act of treason.


Why couldn't the US run a blockade in response to Russia sending nuclear missiles to Cuba?

A blockade was considered an act of war.


Does extreme military necessity excuse what are normally considered war crimes under the laws of war?

No. Implicit in the concept of "war crimes" is the understanding that the exigencies of war excuse certain acts that would otherwise be considered illegal. Any act, therefore, that falls outside what is considered acceptable during wartime would still be considered a war crime, regardless of the "necessity." In other words, the concept of "military necessity" has already taken into consideration when deciding what is, and what is not, a war crime.