Someone with a lengthy criminal background may be considered non-credible.
Non-credible means the finder of facts (generally the jury) would not believe the witness's testimony. This could be because of a criminal background, a history of deception, or because of his/her own interest in the outcome of the case. For example, if the witness has a relationship with the defendant, his alibi that he was with the defendant at the time that the crime was committed may not be credible.
An eye witness is as it sounds. It is somebody that witnessed or saw an event unfold with their own eyes (usually a crime)
anyone can post an answer and even if its a convincing one doesnt make it right
1879
Yes she is.
a lawer can wittness a contract
Yes she is
yes he was
Yes, probably a few.
Yes
The Confrontation Clause of Amendment VI.
people are primary because they are the one who sees it and are the eye wittness
It's considered gambling and therefore morally wrong.