A jury foreman.
The spokesperson of a jury is called the foreperson. They are responsible for leading jury deliberations, communicating the verdict to the court, and overseeing the jury's activities during the trial.
If you mean an Indictment by a Grand Jury, the answer is yes. If you mean anything having to do with their deliberations, the answer is no - all of that is secret. In federal criminal cases, and in some state cases, a transcript of the grand jury proceedings which led to an indictment may be obtained through discovery by the defendant in his particular criminal case.
When instructions are finished the jury begins deliberations.
If you mean an Indictment by a Grand Jury, the answer is yes. If you mean anything having to do with their deliberations, the answer is no - all of that is secret. In federal criminal cases, and in some state cases, a transcript of the grand jury proceedings which led to an indictment may be obtained through discovery by the defendant in his particular criminal case.
The Grand Jury, which is composed of five men and seven women, were only out twenty minutes during their deliberations.
The foreperson in a criminal case acts as the spokes-person for the jury. The foreperson asks the judge any questions the jury might have and delivers the verdict at the end of the case. The foreperson is responsible for the conduct of the jury during deliberations. However, they are not allowed to influence the other jurors in any way and their vote carries no more weight then that of other jurors.
The meaning of the legal word findings is the result or decision made by deliberations of a jury or court.
No. Where the jury acts, the jury acts as trier of fact only. The court routinely instructs the jury as to principles of law and their application, but the court, not the jury, determines the applicable law and how it is to be applied. In this, the jury has no discretion.
Foreperson / Foreman / Forewoman are all terms used for the spokesperson of a jury.NOTE: This position is never referred to as "the chairperson of a jury". It is not the same meaning.
To avert one's eyes in such a manner is usually an admission of guilt: You've done something you are not proud of because you know it was not the right thing to do, but you did it anyway. That's psychological, not just literary. To apply that more to the situation being referenced, the jury likely produced an answer they knew was wrong, so wrong that they could not even face the defendant they were condemning. How ironic: the jury was more guilty than the defendant.
that means to have objective Jury