because i say so!
I would say the Judicial Branch.
it means to follow laws
i cant say, i mean alot of sites say no but if they say yes, they dont list the laws at all so its hard to tell at all. sorry?
An inference is when the scientist draws a conclusion from something where as an observation is experimental (and thus empirical) proof of something. Another way of thinking about it is that observations follow laws while inferences, or hunches, tend to follow theories. Remember, just because a law might not be known yet, doesn't mean it doesn't exist! Many theories end up uncovering new scientific laws through research and experimentation!
Empirical is defined in the oxford dictionary as something based on experience or observation rather than logic. For data to be considered empirical it does not need to be fact. It is often used interchangeably with first hand experience. Therein, one could say that empirical findings are extrapolated anecdotal data, as anecdotal is also defined as being based on personal experience rather than facts. Theoretical evidence would explicitly oppose empirical evidence because it is based on calculation and cannot be opinionated. It is meant to be concise and eliminate ambiguity which empirical or anecdotal evidence can not.
Say "nothing happens without a cause". The empirical evidence for this is so overwhelming, it could be considered proof of God.
Yes there are laws. These laws say not to use CFC's.
The document that holds our fundemental laws well let me just say it like this no one or nothing holds our fundemental laws because our laws are just constructed so what i am really tring to say to you is the word you would use on this question of yours is constitution..............p.s i hope you understood.
The empirical formula for methyl butyrate is C5H10O2.
You need to say what the following laws are.
no