binding(mandatory) precedent persuasive precedent
Precedent
so he/she has someone else to look at the evidence with and make a better decision
so he/she has someone else to look at the evidence with and make a better decision
an appeal to precedent is a type of an appeal to precedent is a type of
A "landmark" or a "precedent-setting" case.
it depends on how old the precedent is, how closely related is it to the case you are looking at and the difference between your precedent and crown/defense lawyer's precedent
precedent
Precedent
About like over quite a few million a year...
precedent
No. An appeal to precedent is a type of analogy. This is the practice of using a case that has already been decided in a court of law (the precedent) as an analog with which to compare the case in question. If the case in question is sufficiently similar to the precedent, and the precedent stands on the authority of the court's ruling, then it may be argued by analogy that the case in question should receive the same ruling. It would be inconsistent, hence illogical, to treat like cases (the analogs) differently. (McGraw Hill Moral reasoning)