Both use reasoning and support to back up a claim <-------<('-'<) Apex
Arguments can be used for both explanations and persuasion. In an explanation, an argument is presented to help clarify or support a claim or position. In persuasion, arguments are used to convince someone to adopt a particular belief or take a specific course of action.
Both inductive and deductive arguments are forms of reasoning used to support conclusions. They both aim to provide evidence or support for a claim. Additionally, both types of arguments can be used to make logical connections between premises and conclusions.
You can not both claim her. If he stops claiming her then you can.
It depends on what the parenting and support document says. Some former couples share, some do not.
They believed that African-Americans had to leave the South to avoid injustice.
Both reasons and evidence support an argument by providing justification and proof for a claim. Reasons offer logical explanations or justifications for why a particular claim is true, while evidence includes facts, data, or examples that back up those reasons and strengthen the argument. In essence, reasons and evidence work together to make a persuasive case for a particular position or perspective.
it will help you organize facts that both support and attack
Open first document. Minimize it within the program. Drag the entire background (not document) across both screens. Now do one of two things: 1. Reposition the first document on the left-hand screen only, leaving the gray background box empty on the right. Open second document and position on right. OR 2. Open both documents and under "View" or "Window" at top, select Tile. Now you should be able to see both documents.
You can only claim your sister and her daughter on your taxes if you supported them and they lived in your household. Benefits have to be added to the return as income to the household.
A Search Warrant is 1 document An Arrest Warrant is 1 document. There is no document that allows both.
The custodial Parent has the right to claim both children, but in your case if the NC parent is behind they will automatically take it from their tax refund anyway. But as with any agreement if it states the NC gets to claim one then you can only claim one. If there is not an agreement in that way, then the custodial has the right. The arrears owed to the C has no affect on the claiming rights of another.