Essentially, Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution and used a loose interpretation to support a strong Federal Government and Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation, and was in favor of a not so strong Federal Government with more power and rights being given to the States. The stem of much of their disagreement was their interpretations of the Elastic, or Necessary and Proper clause of the Constitution (Article 1 Sec. 8 Clause 18).
The Articles of Confederation showed that people feared a strong government similar to the monarchy in Britain.
created a strong national government(arguments for) Article of federalist was against because they believe to much power in the hand of big government.
The elastic clause in the constitution allows congress to make all laws that are "necessary and proper" for carrying out the listed powers.
Alexander Hamilton favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which allowed for a strong national government because Congress could pass laws based on the "elastic clause."
a strong country needs a strong government, or it will collapse.
cause
The Federalists wanted a strong central government. They benefitted because a strong central government was created.
no, it does not have a strong central government
The Federalists wanted a strong central government.
A strong central government
The Federalists wanted a strong central government whereas the Republicans feared a strong central government.