0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Should Federal Judges only interpret existing laws or should they be able to create new laws?
No, federal judges should not be able to create new laws since that's the job of the legislature. Judges should only interpret existing laws instead of trying to write them.
Only people in Great Britain should write laws in parliament?
only people in great Britain should write laws in parliament
Activist judges believes that the courts should?
Activist judges believe that the courts should play a more active role in policy making and be willing to strike down federal laws, whereas judges favoring restraint believe that the courts should defer to the elected branches of government.
Why don't judges answer political questions?
Judges interpret the laws and legislators (or politicians) enact the laws. The separation of powers requires that the judiciary and the legislative branches remain separate, and accordingly judges should remain politically neutral.
Why should the supreme court not review the decisions of the National Assembly of Pakistan?
Parliament is a law making organ. They vote for new laws. Judiciary is a different organisation. Their power is different. They just safeguard the laws (by constitution). They are the judges. Supreme court is the only arbritation authority in some occasions. For example: mistakes by parliament or by the President (if not satisfied by rule, constitution). So sometime Supreme court takes on others.
Is it true or false that English colonists in America believe that Kings should make all the laws?
False. They believed that Parliament should make the laws, but when the King interfered, some of the colonists rebelled and started the United States.
Which arm of the government has the power to interpret and apply laws?
There are three arms of power: Legislative Power, Executive Power and Judicial Power. It is the Judicial Power (The Judges) that has the power to interpret and apply laws in Australia. Courts and judges are independent of parliament and government.
What is the meaning of the notion that judges should not make the law but uphold it?
Judges are meant to interpret what they think the law(s) mean, and follow the means of law in court form their interpretation but they aren't meant to make laws to fit their ruling or make laws at all( that's legislative).
What are the two kinds of laws you have in australia?
Statute law and common law are the two types of laws in Australia. Statute law refers to the legislation passed in parliament. Upon approval by parliament, statute law becomes common law. Common law emanates from the judiciary, and they are laws passed by juries and judges.
What is mant by the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy?
The supremacy of parliament in England means that the parliament if the only supreme authority in England in the sence of legislating laws. Parliament is supreme to all government instituions and monarch also. It is the only body which can make, alter, ammend or repeal any law whatever and whenever.
In Canada What is the role of the legislature?
Canada's Parliament makes laws within the limits set out in the Constitution. Parliament includes an elected House of Commons, an appointed Senate, and Her Majesty when in Canada, and otherwise Her Majesty's representative, Canada's Governor General.
In the words of Justice Felix Frankfurter what does legislatures make law whoe sales judges retail mean?
This quote emphasizes the distinction between the roles of legislatures and judges in the legal system. Legislatures create general laws that apply broadly to society, while judges interpret and apply those laws to specific cases, like a retail store selling goods to individuals. It underscores the idea that judges should not create new laws, but rather interpret and apply existing laws.
