The answer depends upon what country you are referring to.
If you mean in the United States, then the answer is this: deciding who can and cannot marry is a function of state government, not federal government. The only role the federal government plays in same-sex marriage is deciding whether to recognize it or not. As of June 2013, the US federal government does recognize same-sex marriage. In that sense, same-sex marriage is as federal as it can be right now.
In Canada, the federal courts now mandate that all provinces must perform and recognize these marriages.
In Mexico, the federal government mandates that all states must recognize, but not necessarily perform, these marriages, although if you sue for the right to get married in your state, the federal court will grant it.
In Australia, the federal courts recently decided that the federal ban on same-sex marriage cannot be circumvented by individual states and territories enacting their own same-sex marriage laws.
No. One of the best recent developments in US Law is the realization that the government shouldn't intrude behind closed doors in private homes and in private matters. Marriage is a private matter between the parties and the government has no business telling us who we can and cannot marry. One of the most dangerous steps a government can take is to legislate upon the moral disapproval of one group and to apply that legislation to only a few citizens who happen belong to another group.
A federal law exists banning federal recognition of same-sex marriage. It is not within the authority of the President to overturn that law. This can only be done by the legislative or judicial branches of the federal government. Therefore, President Obama has no choice but to leave the issue to the federal government for a decision.
It violated a federal law banning the sale of weapons to the Contras. - apex
No. A Navajo law banning same-sex marriage was enacted on April 22, 2005.
Does the labor dept have any information about federal employees who are in common law marriage.
It violated a federal law banning the sale of weapons to the Contras. - apex
He apparently supports it. Some of his actions have been helpful to proponents of same-sex marriage, namely his February 2011 announcement that his office will no longer defend the constitutionality of the federal law banning federal recognition of same-sex marriages.
There is no 'federal' law banning them, but in most jurisdictions they ARE illegal under local statutes.hi
This does not necessarily have to occur. The constitutions does not define individual rights outside of the Bill of Rights, and it does not address marriage at all; the Defense of Marriage Act does that (DOMA: Public Law 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419, signed into law by President Bill Clinton on September 21, 1996, 1 U.S.C. § 7 and 28 U.S.C. § 1738C is a United States federal law under which the federal government defines marriage as "a legal union between one man and one woman." Under the law, no U.S. state or other political entity can be required to recognize as a marriage a same-sex relationship considered a marriage in another state.). In fact, the constitution does not mention marriage within it, so for same-sex marriage to be legal, laws have to be passed state by state or DOMA must be repealed; it cannot be accomplished by federal amendments.
no there should not be a law on banning sharks......they were made for a purpose in this world
The law here is very correct in banning child marriage in all forms, so there is no way to get a minor married of.
It violated a federal law banning the sale of weapons to the Contras. - apex
"Common law marriage" does not exist in most jurisdictions. The obvious difference is the absence of legal protections, obligations and benefits that come automatically with a legal marriage under state and federal laws.