Because, without probable cause, any evidence found is inadmissible. You can't go in looking for a gun, for instance, and find a knife, and subsequently use that to convict.
you can get a picture off of google on the i touch by holding down on the picture for a few then it will ask to save image or you can open your photos in itunes and drag it in there.
It's not possible say without your specifying which meaning of "convict" you're considering. CON vict is a convicted criminal. conVICT is what the jury voted to do in court.
Mere belief refers to holding a belief or opinion without substantial evidence or justification to support it. It may not be based on rational reasoning, empirical evidence, or critical analysis.
The duration of Without Evidence is 1.55 hours.
Without Evidence was created on 2000-09-12.
Double jeopardy
If an officer were to obtain evidence illegally, such as searching you without probable cause, the evidence they acquired would not be admissible in court. That's not to say the entire case would be thrown out, but that single piece of evidence would not be allowed in court. The exclusionary rule doesn't prevent unlawful searches and seizures, but it disincentivizes them by making evidence seized unlawfully inadmissible at trial. There's no reason to illegally obtain evidence if it can't be used to convict a defendant.
Nothing is known about the circumstances of your question. It MAY be, but there is no guarantee. Your attorney would have to mount a convincing argument to the court that the search WAS improper. Even if that hapopens there may be enough evidence to convict you anyway, even without the search. Consult with your attorney.
Your breath
Blame without evidence is an allegation; the act of blaming without evidence is alleging; a person making an allegation is an accuser.
Without Evidence - 1923 was released on: USA: 2 January 1923