An employer is absolutely and strictly liable for any injuries his employees sustain while in the course of their occupation. Fortunately, most states have adopted "sole remedy" laws that provide a great deal of protection, for employers, from employee lawsuits, as long as the employer has purchased workers compensation insurance. Talk to a local broker or agent to clarify the laws in your jurisdiction.
No, a company can be sued if the company does not exist anymore. The owners of the company may be liable. An attorney can help you decide the best action to take.
YES!
No, employees are not liable for company losses.
If a user illegally installs software on their home computer, they are held liable. (If a child illegally installs software on a parent's computer, the parent will most likely be held liable, depending upon the age of the child.) The exact person held liable is more sketchy when applied to a company. If the company has masterminded the illegal installation of software (i.e., they told the employees to do it), they will most likely be held liable. If an employee illegally installs software on a company computer, the installer will be held liable, but the company might also be held liable, depending on the circumstances and the degree to which the company was involved. The court sentence varies, but in the U.S. it is a maximum of 5 years in prison and/or a $250,000 fine. However, the maximum sentence is usually only used in repeated offenses and extreme first offenses.
No , if an employee has committed fraud and signed a contract under the company knowingly unauthorized then the company may not held liable.
yes
Only humans can be employees. The employees of a subsidiary company are also the employees of the parent company, unless the subsidiary is unusually and intentionally independent.
Federal Employees' Distributing Company was created in 1948.
Depends on the Contract. Alot of subcontractor contracts prevent this. If the Prime contractor has received an estimate from a subcontractor and the subcontractor is working at the site or project under a estimate or purchase order then yes, the Prime contractor can be held liable for all monies under the contract if the subcontractor can prove that the employees were on their payroll and during this project the Prime contractor solicited Sub employees to become independent contractors.
Yes, because Texas is the only voluntary Comp state. But they remain liable for the workers' injuries and should opt out correctly - according to the state rules, filing their decision with the state and posting the proper notice to employees. Employers in all states need to realize they remain liable if they don't have coverage, and that their employees and their employees' families can sue them.
As the employer, who is responsible for paying the payroll tax from which the state collects funds for unemployment benefits, you'd pay in the state where your company is based. Employees pay no unemployment insurance, but can file in the state where they live and that state will act as the "agent" state, in their behalf, and assist them collecting from the "liable" state.
The Trammel Crow Company had 7,100 employees in 2002