Each "fair use" is established on a case by case basis. There is no predetermined amount of copyrighted material that can be used.
US Copyright Law sets out criteria that has to be considered before something can be judged to be "fair use"
# The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes # The nature of the copyrighted work # The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole # The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
None assuming, of course, this use is beyond the scope of "fair use" or other exception to current copyright law. There is no minimum or maximum of a copyrighted work that you can "get away with" using. If you use a recognizable snippet of a copyrighted song, passage from a written work, portion of a recognizable illustration/photograph, etc. you are guilty of infringement.
There is no predetermined amount of copyrighted material that can be used before it's considered an infringement. Each case is judged by the planned use & it's purpose.
US Copyright Law sets out for criteria that have to be considered before something can be determined to be "fair use"
# The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes # The nature of the copyrighted work # The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole # The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
There is no set limit. Prior court cases have based their decision on how important the excerpted portion is to the "heart of the work".
A famous case will illustrate what I mean.
The Nation magazine published a review of former President Gerald Fords' autobiography & directly quoted only 300 words from the entire book. They were sued for copyright infringement & lost.
The court based their decision on the fact that the 300 words used were about the pardon of Richard Nixon and were outside the "fair use" exception because they were published with the intent to "scoop" the authorized first book publication.
You would need permission from the copyright holder of the photos, which is not necessarily the copyright holder of the book. There should be photo credits near the photos or in a separate index; contact the rightsholders in writing, being specific about what you want to do.
Yes; short phrases like titles are not protected by copyright.
I am quite sure it is in the front few pages.
Not necessarily. You need to make sure the copyright on the book has expired.
Nowhere legally. You can buy the e-book and DVD then download them to your computer, but you won't get them for free without violating copyright laws.
If you have a copy of the book, there will be copyright information on one of the very first pages in the book; probably before any preface, foreword or contents pages. If you don't have a copy, call the reference desk at your local public library and inquire.
Usually, the time the book was written is at the front, check the first few pages.
Well It depends on the play. All Shakespeare plays for example, don't have any copyright on them, so they can be used by anyone at any time. I would search up the play In question and find out if It is under any legal protection.
infringing copyright B. flaming C. hacking infringing copyright
No, that is not true at all. Any book published in the US before 1923 is out of copyright.
How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying - book - has 148 pages.
No, your book is copyrighted whether or not it is registered and whether or not you intend to enforce the copyright during your lifetime.