At the time of cross-examination the witness will be caught.
Added: By virtue of the ciminal investigation which led to the arrest and charging of the defendant(s), the prosecutor pretty much already knows the facts of the case and can generally tell when a witness's statements stray off into deceptions or outright lies. When a prosecutor questions a witness he is NOT guessing at what the witness's answer might be, he already knows what it should be.
If it is a sequestered PROSECUTION witness, of course he can talk to them. If the witness is a defense witness the prosecutor shouldn't be talking to them whether they are sequestered, or not.
The prosecutor glared at the witness and questioned her in an accusatory tone.
If the witness is a Prosecution Witness - the Prosecutor's initial questioning of their own witness is referred to as direct examination.If, after the defense asks that witness questions (known as cross examination), the prosecutor feels the need to re-question their witness again (to clarify certain matters) that is called re-direct examination.
true
No. At least, not within our framework of jurisprudence. Other laws/conditions may apply in other countries.
Witness
A grand jury witness can expect to answer questions from the prosecutor and defense attorney. They may also have to answer questions from the judge.
Don't know who you are referring to when you use the term 'claimant.' If an indictment has been dismissed, the defendant will be notified, and the copmplaining witness should be notified by the prosecutor's office.
(in the US) Not directly on their own authority. HOWEVER, if the case is presented to the prosecutor and the prosecutor believes that you are an important material witness to the prosecution of the case, he can request that the court issue a travel restirction to you to prevent you from leaving the court's jurisdiction.
It can be. It is up to the prosecutor or the defense lawyer. They need to be notarized.
I've read the question four times but can make no real sense of it - so I'll try to break it up and answer it in segments.(1) Yes, the prosecuter can make a motion to the court for ANY reason, just as the defense can. They will explain the motion, based on law, and the judge will rule and either grant the motion, or not.(2) WHO alleges that the witness is lying? If the witness is lying then the defense counsel has the right to impeach them under cross examination, so I don't see what the problem is.(3) I'm unable to make head nor tail of the police department's alleged involvement in this scenario. What, or who, did they "generate?"
The cast of Milosevic on Trial - 2007 includes: Wesley Clark as Himself - Witness Carla Del Ponte as Herself - Chief Prosecutor Vladimir Dzuro as Himself - Investigator Dermot Groome as Himself - Prosecutor Ogon Kwon as Himself - Judge Dean Manning as Himself - Investigator Mira Markovic as herself Slobodan Milosevic as himself Ratko Mladic as himself Geoffrey Nice as Himself - Leading Prosecutor Vojislav Seselj as Himself - Witness Obrad Stevanovic as Himself - Witness Dragan Vasiljkovic as Himself - Witness