Mostly anyone can be selected to counsel someone in a court of law. Most small claims courts restrict the use of lawyers as legal representation. Most of the work takes place before any court date, when all evidence must be submitted to the court and both counsels outline their positions. On the actual court date, in most cases the prosecution will outline their case against the defendent and then the defendent can argue their innocence. During opening statements to the court, this is not the time to issue objections. After opening statements the prosecution will open its case and maybe call witnesses. The defense counsel will have the chance to question any witnesses. You can question any witness within reasonable grounds, you must always have relevance to the matter at hand. The judge will not be impressed if you try to question a witness about anything not relevant ie. unrelated events from many years ago, political views, private life. Leading questions will also be thrown out, for example 'The weather on that day was cloudy, wet and windy wasn't it?' This would be a clear example trying to lead a witness. In defending someone you will be allowed to call witness or the defendent but you cannot announce a witness to the court-it is not TV. In most cases witnesses need to be summoned to appear and the prosecution must be allowed notice of any evidence or witnesses you intend to produce-you are allowed the same procedures. An endless parade of character witnesses will not be tolerated, again you must stick to the case at hand. At this time your defendent can chose whether to give evidence or not. Having choosen this the defendent must be prepared to be questioned by the prosecution, the defendent can refuse to answer any questions but must accept such actions can prejudice their case. Finally, both teams can give closing statements to the court before the verdict is considered. I would always counsel that anyone going to court should consult a legal specialist. The person who represents themselves is either a fool or as a client who is one.
It depends on what kind of courts we're talking about. Both the plaintiff and defendant can have attorneys present (say a smalls claim course) but for something in a state course (crimes like burglary, rape, murder, assault, etc.) it's usually the Prosecutor who is the district attorney and represents the people then there is the defendant who has the right to an attorney.
Lawyers defend people in court.
No, a player must be in court if they want to defend an on court player.
the second amendment
6th amendment.
why did hamilton defend the loyalists in court after the american revolution
It means that the person is representing themselves and does not have an attorney.Added: Unsure what the questioner is asking. The court can refer to someone as a Pro Se defendant (meaning that they are representing themselves without benefit of legal counsel) but the court doesn't "name" someone a pro se defendant.The court cannot require that someone defend themselves.
How would pony boy defend his self
Yes court-appointed attorney to defend me in a tax audit. Everyone is in titled to a public defender.
Someone would need a traffic violation lawyer if they were wrongfully accused of a traffic violation and do not have enough knowledge of the laws to defend themselves in a court.
Get a lawyer.
An attorney appointed by the court to defend an indivudaul whs is unable to afford their own attorney. This can include Public Defenders as well as attorneys in private practice who volunteer their work "Pro Bono."
Apologetics means to defend something by use of intelligent argument. The Bible uses this word when it talks about when someone had an accusation against them (like court) the person had to defend himself by using intelligent arguments. So, apologetics has to do with defending the beliefs a person has.