well that completely depends on if you are FOR or AGAINST capital punishment.
first off, a rebuttal is easy, but you have to try and get into the head of your opponents. try and think of what their argument is going to be.
if they are FOR capital punishment, they might argue that it saves money rather than the gov't paying for the person to stay in the jail for their whole life. or that these people deserve to die.
if they are AGAINST it, they'll probably argue that the gov't has no right to end a person's life, or that we are punishing someone for murder, but my sentencing someone to death row, we are also committing murder.
you can rebut by pointing out the flaws of their argument, and try to hit them with hard facts; do NOT just base your rebut on saying that your opponent is wrong, you won;'t win that way.
hope that helped!!
Your question is a bit unclear but like all debates you have two sides: one FOR the death penalty and one AGAINST it. For instance, its advantages would be that it removes really evil people from society and makes people think twice before doing a serious crime. On the other hand to to take a life like that is simply inhumane and in some ways is worse than the original crime. I, personally, don't how someone could actually inject someone else with the objective to kill them, its true that they use three people to inject the criminal, only one syringe carrying the deadly liquid but that would mean that after you had injected three people you had probably killed on of them.
No, there is a lot of debate concerning the use of the death penalty in the United States. For examples of proponents and opponents to the use of the death penalty, check the below sites:
Death penalty should be a law bcoz criminals are no pity . Its very unfair to the victims.
Good popular debate topics are the following: -Healthcare -Whether or not social networking sites are safe -Abortion -Death Penalty
Animal testing, the legality of assisted suicide and internet censorship are all good debate topics. The death penalty is another good debate topic.
Barry M. Anderson has written: 'The Death Penalty Debate'
For. If most of the citizens in Texas did not want the death penalty, there would be no death penalty.
Now, no death penalty in Romania.
No,the state of Nebraska does not have the death penalty.
no, you dont die with the death penalty
No,the state of Missouri does not have the death penalty.
In debating terminology, 'This House' refers to this government. For example, in the motion, "This House believes that the death penalty should be abolished", it is saying that the government believes the death penalty should be abolished. When debating, teams continuously refer to the term 'This House' or 'on our side of the House'.
anti- death penalty i am a anti death penalty... because death penalty is not a human punishment..