sufficient is used when we suggest a close meeting of a need . adequate may imply barely meeting a requirement . (Webster)
explain sufficiency of consideration, by giving a case
seven years
It means that although consideration must provide some benefit to the promisor or detriment to the promisee, these do not however have a great deal. Providing something is given in return for a promise, it does not matter that it is not much, or not what the promise would usually be considered worth.Courts would not inquire into the adequacy of consideration so long as there are some. The reason for this rule is due to the old idea of freedom of contract, which required that the parties themselves should be allowed to make bargains that suit them without interference from courts.
Yes
Executed and executory consideration is enforced by the common law courts but a past consideration is not. This is because a past consideration arises where the work is done before the obligation or offer to pay is made. See the case of EASTWOOD VRS KENYON.
There is no measurable, quantifiable measure of this definition. It is a totally subjective view of the case, taken in its totality, by the presiding judge.
Lord Denning's view on consideration was that the courts should not be too strict in requiring consideration in contract law to uphold agreements that are fair and just. Some legal scholars agree with this perspective, while others argue that consideration is an essential element in forming a valid contract. Ultimately, the interpretation of consideration may vary depending on the specific jurisdiction and context.
Bankruptcy Courts are FEDERAL. You must be allowed to practice in a particular District by the Court, meaning you know the conventions and customs of the area more than anything. State is not a consideration.
{| |- | No, they cannot, though the court will often take it into consideration when making decisions. Until the child reaches adulthood the parents control where they live. Some courts will take the child's preferences into consideration. |}
Section 11 states that access to the courts and adequate legal assistance is available to everyone, no matter what their financial circumstances. This means that even the poorest can be guaranteed that they will have a fair day in court with adequate legal representation.
A person taking DNA for the courts can make a mistake determining paternity. Normally if there was a match, it is correct.