dicey's exposition of rule is base on holy misconception. he has not foresee the evolution of system, due to which his thesis not support administrative law. his thesis can also be criticized on following;
1- INHERENT AMBIGUITY:- decision of parliament always based on majority's decision. if so then what about minority. in this sense majority holds arbitrary powers.
2- IF PARLIAMENT ENACTED BAD LAW:- if parliament passes a bad law then is the rule of law consider it a supremacy of law?
provincetown
what is the resolutin in the book diceys song
Rule by law is completely different than rule oflaw. Unlike rule of law, which states that no citizen is above the law, rule by law, involves arbitrary government rule, by using the law to implement their decisions.
Rule by law is completely different than rule oflaw. Unlike rule of law, which states that no citizen is above the law, rule by law, involves arbitrary government rule, by using the law to implement their decisions.
No one is above the Rule of Law, not even the US President.
the rule of law
Rule of Law
the rule of law
Rule Of Law. :)
When the rule of law stops, anarchy begins.
Perphas, meaning of RULE & LAW is same but Law is official word where Rule is unofficial.
That is one of the essential definitions of democarcy that they be ruled by law. ---- Absolutely not! A democracy is characterized by majority rule. The "law" is whatever the majority says it is, and it can change like the weather. The "rule of law" is one of the measures taken to prevent tyranny by the majority. The "rule of law" protects the rights of individuals from the whims of the majority.