no it even says on the tin cans that they do cause harm so if you could sue tobacco companys for the loss of your teeth then every tobacco user would sue
because that wasthe worst loss
yes
negligence
sue decides to drive to los angeles from san francisco to visit her son , who attended ucla
You can only collect the amount of your actual loss but no more than the limits on the policy. If a person does not have enough limits on his policy and he hit you then you can sue him for more but you will not be able to collect the policy limits amount then still sue for the remainder of the loss.
If you have a loss worth suing someone for you would not have to try to figure out what to sue for. This is ridiculous. If the other party who hit you has insurance they will take care of your damages and that's it.
You need to be more specific about where the loss occurred. If it happened in a no-fault jurisdiction, your right to sue is typically more limited than in a tort jurisdiction.
YES YES and yes, i am studying that in family law at the mo
No - those items might be thrown out by the judge or magistrate
Yes, they can still sue you even if they have written off the debt as long as they file a lawsuit before the statute of limitations expires. Writing off the debt allows them to take a loss for tax purposes. If they do sue and collect from you, they have to report it as new income.
Sue? You can probably file a complaint with the local Postmaster, or the US Postal Inspection Service, but unless you can prove some tangible loss, probably not.