Parts of laws can and are ruled to be unconstitutional - the remaining provisions stay in tact until and unless they are challenged as well. Parts can be ruled unconstitutional without effecting the entire bill/law.
by allowing unconstitutional laws to be challenged and overturned
The US Supreme Court can nullify laws that are unconstitutional, but only if the law is appropriately challenged by a person or entity with standing.
They can strike down any law they see as unconstitutional if it is challenged in court.
Yes, an ordinance can be challenged in a court of law if it is believed to be unconstitutional, in violation of state or federal law, or otherwise legally flawed. Parties with legal standing can file a lawsuit to challenge the validity or enforcement of an ordinance.
The judicial branch can say if a law is unconstitutional.
It means to withstand a legal challenge on Constitutional grounds. An unconstitutional law is one that will not "pass Constitutional muster," and would be overturned by the SCOTUS if challenged.
If a law violates the US Constitution, it is said to be unconstitutional.
A law that violates the constitution is said to be unconstitutional.
They actually can't, as state law is overridden by federal law.
No. The draft law has never been successfully challenged, and no court has ever ruled that the Vietnam-era draft was unconstitutional.
They are called "unconstitutional laws".