In theory, a royalty is a term of contract under which someone pays for the use of rights under property owned by others, often as a percentage of profits.
In practice, requiring someone to pay royalties for an invention after it becomes "public domain" would be considered a "misuse of patents", by attempting to extend its term against contracted parties.
Supposedly it expired decades ago...
Lipitor which expired in 2011 was the most valuable patent ever with sales exceeding $105 over the life of the patent.
sorry, I meant diovan
US patents are for 20 years, so a 1992 patent expired on its issue date in 2012.
Yes, but only for "bragging rights". Any patent issued in 1965 expired long ago, making the inventions claimed in it "public domain". Old patent are sometimes "valuable" as "prior art" to prevent others from attempting to patent the same thing AGAIN.
yes
Yes. Patents usually expire approximately over a period of 20 years or may expire soon if the annual maintenance fee is not paid properly. A patent published in 1905 is expired and will now be in public domain.
MDMA is not currently protected by a patent. The closest thing is Alexander Shulgin's 1959 patent on "4 alkyl dialkoxy N methyl phenethylamines and their pharamcologically acceptible salts," which has expired.
Patents last 20 years. Kramer's patent, US4667088, expired in 2007 but is still cited in new patents.
I understand Shire bought up all generic manufacturers of Pentasa generic, since tha patent expired. Is that true?
A patent is active for its duration (generally counted as 20 years from its date of filing -- i.e., it's priority date), assuming all post-issuance fees have been paid. You can check with the patent office in the country where the patent was issued to determine its status in that country.
Other companies that gained access to the saxophone technology after the patent expired improved the saxophone.