0
At a criminal trial the burden of proof is on an accused person to prove his or her innocence.?
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who developed the jury trial in which federal lords determined the guilt or innocence of an accused person?
The romans.
How would you describe a defendant in a criminal case?
A DEFENDANT - In criminal cases is the person accused/charged with the crime.
What is an alfet?
An alfet is a cauldron of boiling water into which an accused person would place his forearm as a test of innocence or guilt.
Should a person be accused of a crime even though he or she is not yet proven guilty or innocent?
People should be accused of crimes if there is some substantial evidence that they have committed them. You do not have to be proven guilty in order to be accused, because if a person is not accused, there won't be a trial, and there will therefore be no opportunity to prove either guilt or innocence in a legal sense.
The burden of proof rested with the accuser rather than the accused what does this mean?
That if there was a doubt about a person's guilt, he or she should be judged innocent.
How would our legal system be different if an accused person had to prove his or her innocence instead of the government having to prove the person's guilt?
If an accused person had to prove their innocence, it would reverse the burden of proof, which is currently on the prosecution. This would likely lead to an increase in wrongful convictions, as it can be challenging for individuals to prove a negative (their innocence). It would also undermine the presumption of innocence, a fundamental principle in our legal system.
In a criminal action who is the person or party accused of an offense?
Depending on where in the process you are speaking of: "person of interest" - "suspect" - "arrestee" - "defendant. "
In the US a person accused of a crime is considered innocent until proven guilty Is this policy the same in the Legal System?
Trial by jury or presumption of innocence
Is it Ethical for a criminal defense lawyer to represent a person believed to be guilty?
It is the right of an accused person to be represened in a trial. A lawyer has a duty to represent an accused person unless by doing so he is in conflict and will not be able to effectively discharge his duty.
What are the chief differences between civil and criminal trials?
Civil trials generally take place to seek justice for events and actions that are not related to crime and where the results are based on compensation or restitution. Criminal trials are usually carried out to establish the guilt of a person accused of a crime with the intention of punishing the guilty party. Although there are many similarities, one of the major differences is that of the burden of proof. A civil trial is usually decided on a preponderance of evidence, that is, the balance of evidence in favor of one side or the other. In a criminal trial, the burden of proof is much tougher, usually where there is no reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused. As the consequences of a criminal conviction can be far more severe than most civil cases, it is right that an accuser has to offer far more solid evidence in a criminal proceeding.
In a criminal case is the accused person allowed to call upon the court to compel witnesses to testify on his or her behalf?
yes
What is the difference between civil liability and penal liability?
A civil wrong is when one person is accused of wronging another person. For example, breaking a contract or crashing into your car. Penal liability refers to criminal wrongs, where a person is accused of wronging society.
