If a patient goes to one doctor and begins abusing the medications prescribed by that doctor, no. If a patient begins going from doctor to doctor to obtain prescriptions, however, they can be accused of fraudulently obtaining prescriptions, and sometimes intent to sell because of the amount of medication involved. Both of which can carry jail time in some states. If a person is doctor shopping, or is going to ERs to try and obtain more medication, it can and will be noticed. ERs do keep records, and insurances flag people as over-using. Once your insurance flags you, it is not far from your doctor being notified - at which point they will flag you and stop prescribing. If you don't have insurance, don't think you avoid this loophole. In 2005 the president signed the Federal Prescription Database into law. Now the government has a list of every prescription you've been taking since then.
Idm
the legal ramification of Psychology of command?
the legal ramification of Psychology of command?
Legal implications of drug use is a "loaded" question. It depends on whether or not the drug is legal for use in society. If the drug is "legal" AND prescribed by a physician licensed to prescribe said "drug", and used ONLY by the patient to whom the "drug" was prescribed, then there should be no LEGAL ramifications. If, AND ONLY if the "drug" in question is listed as ILLEGAL for consumption in society will legal ramifications occur. In other words: If you are using MEDICATION (drugs) that are illegal to use, or consuming Medication that has not been prescribed to you by a licensed physician, ultimately you are breaking the law.
Fraud: The legal ramifications are severe in every jurisdiction. You must notify the state that the child is no longer with you.Fraud: The legal ramifications are severe in every jurisdiction. You must notify the state that the child is no longer with you.Fraud: The legal ramifications are severe in every jurisdiction. You must notify the state that the child is no longer with you.Fraud: The legal ramifications are severe in every jurisdiction. You must notify the state that the child is no longer with you.
sue them!
its legal cuz you guys are only a year apart
Lose the opportunity to work there
An alienist is an obsolete word for an expert in mental illnesses, especially with reference to legal ramifications.
There shouldn't be any ramifications. The niece and nephew are not issue and the will should easily take precedence.
There are both legal and moral ramifications of this act. Legally, invasion of privacy and sexual harassment charges are just the start. Morally, the ramifications are also present as this is an unwanted act by the person wearing the skirt and is just plain not nice.
No, but there are several federal laws that control distribution of prescription pain medications. No one may interfere with the legal and legitimate treatment of a patient by his doctor. Any patient!