One perspective: Jesus was found guilty because he HAD to be found guilty. From the point of view of his accusers and judges, he WAS guilty. This is coming from the perspective of salvation history. The entire point of his life was his ultimate sacrifice on behalf of mankind. If he had not been found guilty, then what? His death was completely in keeping with the plan of salvation and his life could not possibly have turned out any differently.
The Accusers has 400 pages.
The afflicted girls are the accusers.
At his trial, Socrates divided his accusers into two camps. The old accusers thought of him as a criminal, given to excessive examination of all, and a teacher of weak argument. New accusers followed the prejudices of the old accusers, perhaps having learned to hate him based on their arguments as they had grown up.
So he could put his head down and not see the accusers all file out with guilty consciences - Jesus had good feelings and did not want to openly shame them.
ergot
One of Socrates' accusers was Meletus, a young poet who accused him of impiety and corrupting the youth of Athens.
they would be questioned as to who/what their accusations were about.
Well, if you don't know who were the accusers, then you might have some problems in your research. For starters, the Nazis were the main, primary, and biggest accusers. The Germans, though far behind, were second, then many of the other peoples throughout Europe were the other accusers.
9
They were tried in court by a panel of judges who were also the jury. The accusers and afflicted pleaded their case against them and they did their best to defend themselves. All the aquittals occured because the judges didn't buy into the accusations anymore.
The Accusers was created in 2003.