Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThis is a very tender and touchy question to answer because companies and most organizations are set up upon ranks of hierocracy and an organizational tree system.
Therefore, reporting wrongdoing to members of a company first or authorities really depend on where in a company the wrongdoing is taking place. My opinion would be that if it is a large company and the wrongdoing is taking place on the lower end of the company I would most likely report it to member who are higher up in the company. If the wrongdoing does not stop or the company from the top is committing the wrongdoing, I will first proceed to report it to the authorities.
The advantages of reporting illegal activity to a company first is that it allows a company the chance to correct their wrongdoings. However, the disadvantages could be harmful. An employee could lose their job, when reported they could go through many red tape, receive manipulation politically, and even die.
Reporting illegal activity to authorities first has advantages like the "NWC" National Whistle Blower Center who broadcast the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2009 on their website of what their protection should be(Williams, 1997 - 2008).
The advantages are to relieve fear and retaliations that may occur which are amoungst the disadvantages. Other advantage if it is authenthic honest and truthful is that reporting wrongdoings of a company the whistleblower recieves percentages of the legal fees incurred which could results in the millions of dollars.
Lastly I would like to add to an disadvantage of reporting illegal activity. Besides from experiecining the process of a lawsuit and trial if a person is found to have claimed a friviluos lawsuit that would tarnish their reputation as an ethical person and prevent them from getting a job in the future.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoChoose your battles carefully. Only fight ones you win. No one likes snitches. Snitches end up in ditches.
Such programs do not attempt to teach what is moral or ethical but, rather, to give business managers criteria they can use to help determine how ethical a certain action might be
The company policy manuals give information about the company history, its mission, and procedures. It gives employees vital information on safety, their duties, and legal and ethical issues.
describe areas of ethical conflict for public sector employees
It's a very good possibility, ethical hackers are usually employed by a company to attempt to hack into security to check defenses. Definitely.
Depending on what stakeholder it is, a shareholder = company gaining lots of profit consumers = operating in an ethical manner employees = better working enviroment
Ethical hacking is where you are hired by a company and you attempt to hack into their system to expose flaws, which are then fixed before a real hacker gets in. You need good computer skills and have to take an ethical hacking course.
The company policy manuals give information about the company history, its mission, and procedures. It gives employees vital information on safety, their duties, and legal and ethical issues.
This ethics office is a tangible sign to all employees that management is serious about encouraging ethical practices within the company
Match the reciepts to the expenses reported
A company's culture includes their business practices and policies. If a company has strict rules and regulations employees will adhere to high standards of ethics.
Social responsibility refers to the voluntary actions a company takes to address social and environmental issues above and beyond what is required by law. Social obligation, on the other hand, refers to the legal and ethical responsibilities that a company has to obey laws and regulations and conduct business in an ethical manner within society. In essence, social responsibility is about going beyond basic obligations to actively contribute to the betterment of society, while social obligation is about meeting minimum legal and ethical standards.