This question is nearly impossible to answer due to having two incredibly nebulous terms "do something" and "about Israel" and is propped on the incorrect assertion that the United Nations either avoids talking about or dealing about problems within Israel. In fact, Israel has had more UN Resolutions written about it or that directly involve it than any other single country in the world and every other country of the world added together (not counting duplicates).
First to the nebulous terms, "do something" can mean just about anything, so the first note is that the United Nations cannot do anything that is outside the provisions of the UN Charter. For those who are Pro-Israel, this means that the UN cannot forcibly disarm Arab States (violation of sovereignty), the UN cannot make Judea, Samaria, the Golan Heights, or East Jerusalem valid Israeli territories (repudiation of Resolutions SC 242, SC 338, SC 478 and violation of the Israeli Peace Treaty with Jordan), and the UN cannot compel Iran to stop its nuclear program (Iran's obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty are subject to the supervision of the IAEA, not the UN). For those who are Anti-Israel, this means that the UN cannot "unmake" Israel (violation of national sovereignty, repudiation of Resolution 181, overrule of several ICC decisions), the UN cannot forcibly disarm Israel (violation of national sovereignty), and the UN cannot make Israel become non-nuclear (Israel has signed no treaty, nor made no obligation on itself to comply with Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty).
As for "about Israel" this can mean whatever a person would like it to mean. It could be "concerning Israel", "due to Israel", "on Israel's behalf", etc. It gives no basis of intent on how to read the question.
As for the UN Resolutions about Israel, they have historically been both inordinate in number and inordinate in scope.
To read all of the various UN Resolutions about Israel, please see the Related Link below.
The United Nations has recommended a partitioning of the British Mandate into a Jewish administered portion and an Arab administered portion (in 1947), recognized the State of Israel when the Jewish administered portion declared itself a sovereign state and the Arab authorities refused to declare itself a state or even to accept the partition (in 1948), admitted the State of Israel as a member nation (in 1949), and in 2014, voted against a resolution calling for Israeli withdrawal from certain areas without face-to-face negotiations. There is nothing for the UN to do 'about Palestine' since no country by that name exists.
As noted by my honorable colleague below, the United Nations was responsible for partitioning the the British Mandate of Palestine into two theoretical countries: a Jewish State (which would eventually become Israel) and an Arab State (which is often seen as a political precursor to the more recent Palestinian movement). However, since this point, the United Nations has done a lot; however, they have not resolved the conflict.
The United Nations cannot do anything that is outside the provisions of the UN Charter. For those who are Pro-Israel, this means that the UN cannot forcibly disarm Arab States (violation of sovereignty), the UN cannot make Judea, Samaria, the Golan Heights, or East Jerusalem valid Israeli territories (repudiation of Resolutions SC 242, SC 338, SC 478 and violation of the Israeli Peace Treaty with Jordan), and the UN cannot compel Iran to stop its nuclear program (Iran's obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty are subject to the supervision of the IAEA, not the UN). For those who are Anti-Israel, this means that the UN cannot "unmake" Israel (violation of national sovereignty, repudiation of Resolution 181, overrule of several ICC decisions), the UN cannot forcibly disarm Israel (violation of national sovereignty), and the UN cannot make Israel become non-nuclear (Israel has signed no treaty, nor made no obligation on itself to comply with Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty).
As for the UN Resolutions about Israel (and about the conflict in general), they have historically been both inordinate in number and inordinate in scope.
what did gorbachev say in his speech in 1992 should be done to the united nations
They didn't. Earthquakes generally don't need any help. no. it means how did the united nations help the people after the earthquake
Never
No.
No, the United Nations Organization did not exist at the time.
we celebrate united nations so we can keep world peace and to honor when the continets joined united nations.
The United Nations still has a small presence in Rwanda to help maintain the peace.
The United Nations- formed by FDR, Stalling and Churchill
It is said, that who you know might help you get a job at United Nations. Another place to look for a job opening at the United Nations is their career portal.
sam loves timmy 4 ever and always
Yes because the UN is a modern version of the League of Nations which was thought of from the US.
Nothing. The United Nations has not said anything important or interesting about Afghanistan.