no, but i think they should be
Absolutely . They should provide it .
Is totally wrong! Citizens should have their own choices in health care. The government should never interfere in this.
Each government handles health care and the costs differently. It would help to know which government and health care programs that you are referencing.
The debate on national health care is a debate about whether or not the government should offer free health services to it's citizens.
The government needs to be involved in creating equal opportunity for all citizens
Has any branch of government voted on health care reform?
As much as government plays a very big role in Health Care, it does not do this very successfully. Taking into consideration the state in which some public Health Care institutions are as well as the quality of the services rendered by these institutions. If we compare private health care with public health care, it is definitely not as similar as we would like it to be, but then again, if health care is provided by the government to us, without any payment, it is generally accepted that we be grateful. My question however referring to the above mentioned should we be satisfied with inadequate health care just because we are not paying for it?
Well, in my opinion, it is up to the citizen to take control of his or her health care and seek out health insurance, but if there are any barriers in his or her way, like money or something, then the government should step in and take responsibility, because I think that either way everyone is important and if there is someone without insurance then the government should find out why and help. Additionally,government should set a standard to make sure people who really need help.
Universal health care is when health care is provided by the Federal Government. Everyone is covered, but not necissarily with a good plan.
Health Care
health care should be marketed to patients?