became established at the end of World War II
Ronald Slye has written: 'International criminal law' -- subject(s): War crimes, Crimes against humanity, International offenses
The Nuremberg trials used a combination of international law and customary law as the basis for prosecution. The main legal framework used was the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal, which defined crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes against peace. This established the foundation for prosecuting individuals responsible for atrocities committed during World War II.
The Nazi leaders were charged with crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. These charges were related to their roles in planning, initiating, and carrying out the atrocities of World War II, including the Holocaust.
The main legal principles applied at the Nuremberg Trials were that individuals can be held accountable for committing crimes against humanity, even if they were following orders from a higher authority, and that war crimes are punishable under international law. The trials also established the concept of "crimes against peace" as a basis for prosecuting individuals who initiate aggressive wars.
The four legal principles that emerged from the Nuremberg Trials are: Principle of Individual Responsibility: Individuals are responsible for their own actions. Principle of Just Following Orders: The defense of "just following orders" is not valid if the orders involved committing crimes against humanity. Principle of Crimes Against Humanity: Acts such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against peace are punishable under international law. Principle of International Law: International law applies to individuals, not just states.
Charles Anthony Smith has written: 'The rise and fall of war crimes trials' -- subject(s): International criminal courts, War crime trials, LAW / International, History
The main results of the Nuremberg Trials were the prosecution of prominent Nazi officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other offenses committed during World War II. The trials established the principles of individual accountability for crimes under international law and laid the foundation for future international criminal tribunals.
The main outcome of the Nuremberg trials was the establishment of the principle that individuals can be held accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity. This helped set the foundation for future international tribunals and the development of international humanitarian law.
The major result of the Nuremberg trials was the establishment of the principle that individuals can be held accountable for committing international crimes, such as crimes against humanity and war crimes. This helped lay the foundation for modern international criminal law and the prosecution of individuals responsible for atrocities.
The Nuremberg Trials resulted in the conviction of top Nazi officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other atrocities committed during World War II. The trials established the principles of individual accountability for committing atrocities under international law and laid the foundation for future prosecutions of war crimes.
The Nuremberg trials were created in response to the atrocities committed during World War II, aiming to hold individuals accountable for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. They sought to establish a precedent for international law and ensure that those responsible for these crimes faced justice.