Due to the so called fusion of powers within the UK political system the Prime minister has significant power over parliament. Combined the heavy whip system in force, the PMs power of patronage and a large parliamentary majority the PM is left with significant control in terms of domestic policy. However there are a system of 'checks and balences' in place which are in theory meant to balence the branches of government, i.e the legislature, executive and judicary.
Parliament can scruntise the work of the executive (PM) through committee work, primarily the work of departmental select committees. These committees scruntise the work of gov departments, ministers actions, departmental spendature etc. They can call for people, papers and records. Prime Ministers question time is another vital check on the PM. Ministers can 'interrogate' the pm and departmental ministers in these sessions. This process is hampered however by the fact questions must be submitted to the pm before hand and there have been time reductions in the Blair gov. A backbench rebellion is a further example of parliament holding the PM to account. This is where backbench MPs oppose government policy by voting against it. The extent to which this is used is determined by the majority the PMs party has in the commons e.g Jim Callaghans gov suffered 34 defeats due to a minority gov while Blair suffered only 4.
parliament exercise control over executive by making some provisions in the constitution which help parliament to control executive.
Parliament definitely has a strong influence over the Prime Minister and his cabinet. Most bills have to be passed with majority vote of Parliament.
yes
The federal government can exercise control over interstate trade.
The president has great influence over his cabinet. He chooses who will be in it and can "request" that they resign if he is not satisfied with their performance. The cabinet also has great influence over the president.
Maverick buzzed the control tower after the exercise was over.
To exercise authoritative or dominating influence over; direct.
No- the cabinet does not have any power over the President. In fact, the President is their boss . Of course cabinet members can disagree and give their opinions but the President has the final word.
No, since it is a part of the president's cabinet, the president controls it.
Exercise the authority granted in the document that created their control over the property.
objective of the cost of capital is to exercise control over the cost
Well technically the queen / governor general, but the power they hold over our government is really long gone. So in reality, no one controls them. Additional. But if they perform badly they are likely to be chucked out at the next election. Individuals (Prime Ministers) can be removed by their own party, e.g. Margaret Thatcher, or the PM will remove a Cabinet Minister if he's not doing a good job. But they are not removed as Members of Parliament, only as functionaries within the Government.