answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which of the?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

What was whispered in the ear of victorious roman emperors?

Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.


Did roman expansion contribute to the decline of the rebublic?

Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.


Are there any similar structures like the Colosseum that are still standing today?

Yes, the Romans built many amphitheatres (arenas). At least 230 of them have been found in the areas which were covered by the Roman Empire. Not all of them are still standing, for many there are just ruins left. 94 of them are in Italy, 35 in France, 34 in Tunisia, 15 in England, 10 in Spain, 5 in Algeria, Bulgaria and Switzerland, ,4 in Libya and in Wales 3 in Austria, Croatia Germany,Israel, Portugal, Romania, and Turkey, 2 in Cyprus, Hungary, Scotland and Syria, and 1 in Albania, Greece , Holland, Lebanon, Morocco and Serbia. The city of Rome had two amphitheatres. Besides the Colosseum there was the Amphitheatrum Castrense. The second most famous standing Roman amphitheatre is the Arena of Verona, where they hold concerts and opera performances. Other amphitheatres which are still quite intact are in Pula (Croatia), Arles, Frejus, and Nimes (France), Capua (Italy), Tarragona (Spain), El Djem and Oudna (Tunisia).


Was printing press invented in middle age or modern age?

The first printing press was invented in Germany around the year 1440, towards the end of the medieval period.


What role did religion play at universities in the Middle Ages?

At that time the Universities were Church establishments and students and master were classed as clerics (members of the Church hierarchy); they were "clerks in minor orders".If you went to the University at Paris, for example, and peered in through a window you might at first think you were seeing monks sitting on the floor around a master sitting on his chair. In fact the students all had their heads shaved in the Roman tonsure, just like monks, but their gowns were different (cappae clausaeinstead of monastic habits) - these gowns have survived in a less medieval form in many Universities today.The subjects taught at University were those approved and regulated by the Church, including many subjects with religious connections. It was intended, at least in the early days of universities, that the students would either become teachers themselves or would progress through the ranks of the Church to eventually become priests and bishops. Not all did, of course.

Related questions