Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
primary and secondary sources.
There are three categories for historians and their source material: Primary: ancient historians existed at the time of the event Secondary: ancient historians existed after the event and analysed/used primary sources modern: Modern historaians who use either of the above majority of the primary sources do not criticize Augustus and idolize him, in contrast some secondary sources like Tacitus hate Augustus Overall however it is agreed(by many modern historians) that Augustus was emperor because of his freinds Marcus vipsanius Agrippa and Gaius Maecanus. The primary sources(historians) were either sychophantic or terrified of persecution by Augustus, the Secondary sources are also biased because they were hired by patrons with vested interests in Augustus's depiction. In short thereare a range of views all with their own bias.
the past tense is used for the action completed in the past and the future rense is used to indicate the sction to be completed in future
Past tense
they heated potatoes over the fire and used them for warmth
determine wheter an assertion made by one source is likely to be true
There are more than five types of historians that study the human race. The more historians that look at the challenges and triumphs of the human race, the more insight they can give.
Primary sources are used commonly among historians. A primary source of information is an account from someone that was present at a certain time or event.
to be happy
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
1.archaeologyical sources 2.literacy sources
history
There are three categories for historians and their source material: Primary: ancient historians existed at the time of the event Secondary: ancient historians existed after the event and analysed/used primary sources modern: Modern historaians who use either of the above majority of the primary sources do not criticize Augustus and idolize him, in contrast some secondary sources like Tacitus hate Augustus Overall however it is agreed(by many modern historians) that Augustus was emperor because of his freinds Marcus vipsanius Agrippa and Gaius Maecanus. The primary sources(historians) were either sychophantic or terrified of persecution by Augustus, the Secondary sources are also biased because they were hired by patrons with vested interests in Augustus's depiction. In short thereare a range of views all with their own bias.
Know we study in schools like your schools,but in the past we use to study in Mosque,like christians used to study in church.
People in the past usually studied the stars because they used it to make Calenders and days
Historic records, archeological finds, old artifacts, etc.
The Rosetta Stone had three different languages one of which was Greek, and another was hieroglyphs. Historians already knew Greek so they used it to sort of decode the hieroglyphics.